SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(99.90Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-99187-1

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Rezension: Lücke, Felix (2024): Nicht kodifizierte Regeln im Deutschen Bundestag - Eine empirische und rechtssystematische Studie über das informale Parlament

[review]

Wewer, Göttrik

Reviewed work
Lücke, Felix: Nicht kodifizierte Regeln im Deutschen Bundestag: Eine empirische und rechtssystematische Studie über das informale Parlament. Beiträge zum Parlamentsrecht, Bd. 87. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2024. 978-3-428-59101-5

Abstract

Parliaments cannot function solely based on their legal regulations. Informal rules are also necessary for situations that are not meant to be formally regulated, allowing for a degree of flexibility within parliamentary organization and operations. The author thoroughly examines this other side of ... view more

Parliaments cannot function solely based on their legal regulations. Informal rules are also necessary for situations that are not meant to be formally regulated, allowing for a degree of flexibility within parliamentary organization and operations. The author thoroughly examines this other side of the coin and provides a systematic legal classification of it. Certain "practices" that are generally perceived as fair can foster trust among representatives and factions, as well as between the majority and minority. If parliamentary customs are rigorously rejected by parties that have recently entered the parliament, it not only jeopardizes the working atmosphere but also the overall functionality of the parliament.... view less

Classification
Political System, Constitution, Government

Free Keywords
Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Geschäftsordnung; Gesetzgebungsverfahren; Gewohnheitsrecht; Parlamentarismus; Parlamentsrecht

Document language
German

Publication Year
2024

Page/Pages
p. 451-453

Journal
der moderne staat - dms: Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 17 (2024) 2

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v17i2.15

ISSN
2196-1395

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.