Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMusiał-Karg, Magdalenade
dc.contributor.authorCasal Bértoa, Fernandode
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-19T11:50:14Z
dc.date.available2024-12-19T11:50:14Z
dc.date.issued2025de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/98603
dc.description.abstractIn October 2023, Poland's illiberal right-wing government held a referendum modeled after the one held in Hungary one year earlier. Organized in conjunction with the parliamentary elections under the pretext of "saving costs," the 2023 Polish referendum constitutes the most recent example of how populists can use direct democracy to mobilize their electorate. However, unlike Hungary's experience a year earlier, this referendum highlights how "populist polarizing" referendums can become a double-edged sword. Building on previous work by Bartolini and Mair, and Enyedi, this article introduces a new type of referendum: the populist polarizing. Initiated by populist parties to amplify political divisions for partisan gain, this referendum-type frames choices in starkly oppositional terms, creating an "us vs. them" dynamic that intensifies polarization. We contrast this with the more known and studied "cleavage referendums." In particular, using both primary and secondary data, we demonstrate how Poland's populist government employed the referendum instrumentally. They posed thematically differentiated questions on issues such as relocating migrants within the EU, selling state assets, raising the retirement age, and removing a border barrier. By exploiting emotionally driven political divides, the government aimed to polarize the campaign and mobilize their voters in the lead-up to the general elections. Departing from the case-study literature, we present an innovative argument: opposition parties can counteract populist governments' strategies and successfully defend democracy by encouraging a selective boycott - voting in elections while refusing to participate in the referendum. The Polish experience illustrates how populist polarizing referendums, initially aimed to increase polarization and undermine democracy, can paradoxically be used to reverse democratic backsliding and safeguard liberal democracy. The Polish case shows that populist polarizing referendums are not infallible. While populist forces typically exploit polarization, referendums can also become a tool for the opposition. However, for the strategy to be effective, the opposition must take a constructive and strategic approach.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.othercleavages; populist polarizationde
dc.titleThe Ball That Failed to Curve: The 2023 "Populist Polarizing" Referendum in Polandde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/9206/4134de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume13de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozPolende
dc.subject.thesozPolanden
dc.subject.thesozBoykottde
dc.subject.thesozboycotten
dc.subject.thesozVolksentscheidde
dc.subject.thesozreferendumen
dc.subject.thesozPopulismusde
dc.subject.thesozpopulismen
dc.subject.thesozPolarisierungde
dc.subject.thesozpolarizationen
dc.subject.thesozdirekte Demokratiede
dc.subject.thesozdirect democracyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Partizipationde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical participationen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10054686
internal.identifier.thesoz10039733
internal.identifier.thesoz10061649
internal.identifier.thesoz10055018
internal.identifier.thesoz10063279
internal.identifier.thesoz10040671
internal.identifier.thesoz10054194
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.source.issuetopicCleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Changede
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.9206de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/9206
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record