SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(178.5Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-97816-6

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

State-NGO Relations Under Georgian Dream: From Discursive Confliction to Institutional Deadlock

[journal article]

Kamilsoy, Najmin

Abstract

Georgia's formal sphere of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), often broadly referred to as civil society, has faced numerous challenges concerning its disposition towards the subsequent governments since independence. Particularly under the incumbent Georgian Dream elite, state-NGO relations hav... view more

Georgia's formal sphere of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), often broadly referred to as civil society, has faced numerous challenges concerning its disposition towards the subsequent governments since independence. Particularly under the incumbent Georgian Dream elite, state-NGO relations have gradually deteriorated since 2016 until they fully crumbled in 2023 with the inception of the "foreign agents" law. This article first traces the processes in the mentioned period (2016-2024) to recount the political background of NGO confrontation. Then, based on evidence, including original interview data, it identifies five modes of state pressure on NGOs: surveillance, discursive framing, forging divisions, physical attacks, and legislative restrictions. Lastly, it discusses the implications of the specified pressures, arguing that state-NGO relations in Georgia reached the point of what can be called "deadlock," both discursively and institutionally. Georgia's case represents a vivid example of the globally expanding assault on Western-funded non-profits, though its variation should be studied further regarding the episodes of democratic decay and civil society pushback.... view less

Keywords
Georgia; non-governmental organization; exertion of government pressure; repression

Classification
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture

Free Keywords
NGO

Document language
English

Publication Year
2024

Page/Pages
p. 3-13

Journal
Caucasus Analytical Digest (2024) 139

Issue topic
Georgia's civic sphere in times of fundamental rupture

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000703789

ISSN
1867-9323

Status
Published Version; reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.