SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Deutsch 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Einloggen
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • Über SSOAR
  • Leitlinien
  • Veröffentlichen auf SSOAR
  • Kooperieren mit SSOAR
    • Kooperationsmodelle
    • Ablieferungswege und Formate
    • Projekte
  • Kooperationspartner
    • Informationen zu Kooperationspartnern
  • Informationen
    • Möglichkeiten für den Grünen Weg
    • Vergabe von Nutzungslizenzen
    • Informationsmaterial zum Download
  • Betriebskonzept
Browsen und suchen Dokument hinzufügen OAI-PMH-Schnittstelle
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Volltext herunterladen

(178.5 KB)

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-97816-6

Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export

Statistiken anzeigen
Weiterempfehlen
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

State-NGO Relations Under Georgian Dream: From Discursive Confliction to Institutional Deadlock

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

Kamilsoy, Najmin

Abstract

Georgia's formal sphere of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), often broadly referred to as civil society, has faced numerous challenges concerning its disposition towards the subsequent governments since independence. Particularly under the incumbent Georgian Dream elite, state-NGO relations hav... mehr

Georgia's formal sphere of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), often broadly referred to as civil society, has faced numerous challenges concerning its disposition towards the subsequent governments since independence. Particularly under the incumbent Georgian Dream elite, state-NGO relations have gradually deteriorated since 2016 until they fully crumbled in 2023 with the inception of the "foreign agents" law. This article first traces the processes in the mentioned period (2016-2024) to recount the political background of NGO confrontation. Then, based on evidence, including original interview data, it identifies five modes of state pressure on NGOs: surveillance, discursive framing, forging divisions, physical attacks, and legislative restrictions. Lastly, it discusses the implications of the specified pressures, arguing that state-NGO relations in Georgia reached the point of what can be called "deadlock," both discursively and institutionally. Georgia's case represents a vivid example of the globally expanding assault on Western-funded non-profits, though its variation should be studied further regarding the episodes of democratic decay and civil society pushback.... weniger

Thesaurusschlagwörter
Georgien; nichtstaatliche Organisation; staatliche Einflussnahme; Repression

Klassifikation
politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur

Freie Schlagwörter
NGO

Sprache Dokument
Englisch

Publikationsjahr
2024

Seitenangabe
S. 3-13

Zeitschriftentitel
Caucasus Analytical Digest (2024) 139

Heftthema
Georgia's civic sphere in times of fundamental rupture

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000703789

ISSN
1867-9323

Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet

Lizenz
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.