Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMartin, Silkede
dc.contributor.authorZabal, Anoukde
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-09T12:44:52Z
dc.date.available2020-07-09T12:44:52Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2296-4754de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/68334
dc.description.abstractUsing paradata to modify design features during fieldwork is the earmark of responsive designs (Groves & Heeringa, 2006). One objective of responsive approaches is to improve the composition of the final sample by gaining the participation of nonrespondents. A simple but innovative attempt at realizing such a response intervention was undertaken during the fieldwork of PIAAC Germany 2012. Different groups of nonrespondents were identified for follow-up efforts. With a view to the outcome measures of PIAAC, basic skills of the adult population, two groups were focused: Non-nationals and sample persons with low educational attainment. To identify these groups, different sources of auxiliary data were used (sampling frame, interviewer observations, and a commercial vendor database). Non-nationals were identified using information from the sampling frame. The challenge was to identify sample persons with (presumably) low levels of education. This was achieved by selecting a set of auxiliary variables, and subsequently using classification trees to model and predict sample persons with low levels of education. The sample persons were sent carefully crafted tailored letters during the re-issue phase. Overall, the cost-benefit balance of this intervention is rather disproportionate: A high level of effort with little apparent impact on the final sample composition. Nevertheless, this explorative endeavour was worthwhile and informative. In particular, the model-based prediction of different types of sample persons can be regarded as a promising approach.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.otherauxiliary data; classification tree analysis; Nonresponse; paradata; PIAAC; Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies; refusal conversion; responsive measures; tailored lettersde
dc.titleConverting Nonrespondents in PIAAC Germany 2012 Using Responsive Measuresde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Methods: Insights from the Field
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozFeldforschungde
dc.subject.thesozfield researchen
dc.subject.thesozBildungsniveaude
dc.subject.thesozlevel of educationen
dc.subject.thesozStichprobede
dc.subject.thesozsampleen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10043403
internal.identifier.thesoz10039352
internal.identifier.thesoz10037472
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-13de
internal.identifier.journal472
internal.identifier.document32
dc.source.issuetopicFieldwork Monitoring Strategies for Interviewer-Administered Surveysde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2020-00009de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record