SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(external source)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/43177

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Parliament, the European Commission and the Council of Ministers

Eine vergleichende Untersuchung des Lobbyismus beim Europaparlament, der Europäischen Kommission und dem Ministerrat
[working paper]

Bouwen, Pieter

Corporate Editor
Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung

Abstract

"Ziel dieses Papers ist die empirische Prüfung einer Theorie des Zugangs, in der untersucht wird, welche Logik hinter dem anscheinenden Ad-hoc-Lobbying-Verhalten bei Vertretern von Wirtschaftsinteressen im Mehrebenensystem der EU steckt. Auf der Basis des zugrunde gelegten theoretischen Rahmens wird... view more

"Ziel dieses Papers ist die empirische Prüfung einer Theorie des Zugangs, in der untersucht wird, welche Logik hinter dem anscheinenden Ad-hoc-Lobbying-Verhalten bei Vertretern von Wirtschaftsinteressen im Mehrebenensystem der EU steckt. Auf der Basis des zugrunde gelegten theoretischen Rahmens wird erläutert, wie verschiedene Organisationsformen der Vertretung von Wirtschaftsinteressen (Unternehmen, Verbände, Beratungsfirmen) Zugang zur Europäischen Kommission, zum Europäischen Parlament und zum Ministerrat finden. Anhand einer Theorie von Angebot und Nachfrage von Zugangsgütern ('access goods') wird herausgearbeitet, inwieweit diese Interessensvertreter Zugang zu den genannten Institutionen erhalten. Zugangsgüter betreffen Informationen, die für den Entscheidungsprozess der EU wesentlich sind. Um Zugang zu einer EU-Institution zu erhalten, müssen die Interessensvertreter die von der jeweiligen Institution nachgefragten Zugangsgüter liefern. Den Abschluß des Discussion Papers bildet eine Reihe von Hypothesen darüber, wie der Zugang der genannten Organisationsformen erfolgt. Die Hypothesen werden im Rahmen einer umfassenden empirischen Untersuchung des EU-Finanzdienstleistungssektors analysiert und auf der Grundlage von 126 explorativen und halbstrukturierten Interviews für die drei EU-Institutionen überprüft." (Autorenreferat)... view less


"The aim of this paper is to empirically test a theory of access that investigates the logic behind the apparent ad hoc lobbying behavior of business interests in the EU multi-level system. First, I propose the theoretical framework that attempts to explain the access of different organizational for... view more

"The aim of this paper is to empirically test a theory of access that investigates the logic behind the apparent ad hoc lobbying behavior of business interests in the EU multi-level system. First, I propose the theoretical framework that attempts to explain the access of different organizational forms of business interest representation (companies, associations and consultants) to the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers. The degree of access to these institutions is explained in terms of a theory of supply and demand of access goods. Access goods concern information that is crucial in the EU policymaking process. In return for access to an EU institution, business interests have to provide the access good(s) demanded by that institution. I then derive a number of specific hypotheses about the access of the aforementioned organizational forms. These hypotheses are analyzed in an extensive empirical study of the EU financial services sector. On the basis of 126 exploratory and semi-structured interviews the hypotheses are checked across the three EU institutions." (author's abstract)... view less

Keywords
lobby; European Parliament; European Commission; European Council of Ministers; representation of interests; pressure-group politics; pressure group

Classification
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture
European Politics

Method
empirical; quantitative empirical

Document language
English

Publication Year
2002

City
Köln

Page/Pages
41 p.

Series
MPIfG Discussion Paper, 02/7

Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/43177

ISSN
1864-4325

Status
Published Version; reviewed

Licence
Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications

Data providerThis metadata entry was indexed by the Special Subject Collection Social Sciences, USB Cologne


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.