SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(154.9Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-102195-1

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Great Powers and Gatekeepers in the Western Balkans: Serbia's Strategic Hedging

[journal article]

Tzifakis, Nikolaos
Vasdoka, Eleni

Abstract

Great-power interest in the Western Balkans has risen over the last few years, and while the West, China, and Russia have been competing for influence, Western Balkan leaders have encouraged the greater engagement of external actors in the region. This article contributes to the study of the gatekeep... view more

Great-power interest in the Western Balkans has risen over the last few years, and while the West, China, and Russia have been competing for influence, Western Balkan leaders have encouraged the greater engagement of external actors in the region. This article contributes to the study of the gatekeeping role of Western Balkan leaders by examining Serbia's foreign policy towards great powers since Aleksandar Vučić and his Serbian Progressive Party (hereinafter; the SNS) rose to power. The article argues that Serbia has adopted the strategy of hedging not only towards the European Union (EU) and the United States, but also towards Russia and China, sending ambiguous and contradictory signals on its alignment preferences. In doing so, the incumbent regime has sought to increase its domestic legitimacy and generate benefits for its patronage and clientelistic networks. The article assesses that Serbia’s strategy has been successful, as it has been perceived as credible and has involved only relatively moderate costs for the great powers. Still, the tenability of Serbia's hedging in the long term is doubtful in a structural setting marked by the increased fierceness of the competition between the great powers. Therefore, to comprehend the influence of the great powers on the Western Balkans, we should take into consideration both the structural environment and the preferences and actions of the countries in the region.... view less

Keywords
Southeastern Europe; Serbia; foreign policy; China; Russia; great power; EU; influence; international relations

Classification
International Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policy

Free Keywords
Strategic Hedging; Western Balkans

Document language
English

Publication Year
2025

Page/Pages
p. 287-309

Journal
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs, 29 (2025) 1

DOI
https://doi.org/10.33067/SE.1.2025.15

ISSN
1428-149X

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.