SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(202.9Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-415187

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Just do it? Zum Konzept der Herstellung und Sicherung von Qualität in grounded theory-basierten Forschungsarbeiten

The pragmatist legacy and its impact on qualitative methods: quality enhancement and evaluation criteria in grounded theory-based research
[journal article]

Strübing, Jörg

Abstract

"Der Beitrag schließt an die derzeitige Diskussion um Qualitätssicherung und Gütekriterien für die qualitativ-interpretative Sozialforschung an. Er zeigt, wie sich die grounded theory (in der Version, wie sie Anselm Strauss geprägt hat) auf ein bestimmtes epistemologisches und wissenschaftstheoretis... view more

"Der Beitrag schließt an die derzeitige Diskussion um Qualitätssicherung und Gütekriterien für die qualitativ-interpretative Sozialforschung an. Er zeigt, wie sich die grounded theory (in der Version, wie sie Anselm Strauss geprägt hat) auf ein bestimmtes epistemologisches und wissenschaftstheoretisches Modell beruft, nämlich das pragmatistische, und dass die daraus resultierende Prozesslogik nicht ohne Auswirkungen auf die Verfahren der Qualitätssicherung in der grounded theory bleiben kann. Dazu werde ich zunächst die Kernthesen des pragmatistischen Erkenntnismodells beleuchten, danach wesentliche Arbeitsprinzipien der grounded theory unter dem Blickwinkel der darin implementierten qualitätssichernden Maßnahmen umreißen (wobei die Prozesse des Kodierens im Zentrum der Betrachtung stehen werden), um schließlich die in der grounded theory vorgeschlagenen Gütekriterien und ihren forschungslogischen Hintergrund zu diskutieren." (Autorenreferat)... view less


"Referring to the ongoing discussion on quality assessment and evaluative criteria in qualitative methods the article focuses especially on the grounded theory approach in the tradition of Anselm Strauss. It is argued that having its roots in the pragmatist epistemology and philosophy of science the... view more

"Referring to the ongoing discussion on quality assessment and evaluative criteria in qualitative methods the article focuses especially on the grounded theory approach in the tradition of Anselm Strauss. It is argued that having its roots in the pragmatist epistemology and philosophy of science the grounded theory approach develops strategies to enhance the quality of processes and results that in some parts differ from traditional quantitative methodologies. Having elaborated on grounded theories' pragmatist roots, the paper proceeds by presenting major strategies and techniques dedicated to quality enhancement (like dimensionalization and theoretical sampling). Subsequently, both research logic and rhetorics of evaluation criteria in grounded theory (e.g. theoretical saturation, density and groundedness) are being discussed. This leads to concluding remarks on the need for special evaluation criteria in grounded theory-based research." (author's abstract)... view less

Keywords
social research; grounded theory; qualitative method; pragmatism; philosophy of science; interactionism; social reality; abduction; deduction; induction; research practice; validity

Classification
Research Design
Philosophy of Science, Theory of Science, Methodology, Ethics of the Social Sciences

Method
basic research; epistemological

Document language
German

Publication Year
2002

Page/Pages
p. 318-342

Journal
Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 54 (2002) 2

ISSN
1861-891X

Status
Published Version; reviewed

Licence
Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications

Data providerThis metadata entry was indexed by the Special Subject Collection Social Sciences, USB Cologne


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.