Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKleining, Katrinde
dc.contributor.authorLaufenberg, Jande
dc.contributor.authorThrun, Philipde
dc.contributor.authorEhlert, Dorotheede
dc.contributor.authorWasem, Jürgende
dc.contributor.authorBartol, Arnede
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-11T13:40:41Z
dc.date.available2025-02-11T13:40:41Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn1744-134Xde
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/99877
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Since 2011, the prices for all new drugs in Germany are negotiated based on a benefit assessment. The purpose of this study was to analyze the price regulation of drugs with unproven additional benefit. Methods: Benefit assessment procedures from 2011 to 2020 were reviewed and selected through AMNOG Monitor and Lauer Taxe. Negotiated annual therapy costs, the annual costs of the most cost-efficient appropriate comparative therapy (ACT) and the potential budget impact for 33 included procedures were calculated. Results: 55% of the included drugs achieved a negotiated price higher than the most cost-efficient ACT, 3% were identified as equal and 42% showed lower negotiated prices. The potential savings exceeded expenditures by around EUR 523.5 m. After price flexibility was adopted by the legislator in 2017, the overall potential savings still outweighed the expenditures by around EUR 62 m. Conclusions: Our analysis shows that making price negotiations more flexible by law does not undermine the fundamental aim of the AMNOG, which is to avoid additional expenditure without increased patient benefit. The regulation can thus fulfill the objective provided by the legislature of keeping drugs without proven additional benefits in the German healthcare system.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherAMNOGde
dc.titleTen years of German benefit assessment: price analysis for drugs with unproven additional benefitde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalHealth Economics, Policy and Law
dc.source.volume19de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozGesundheitspolitikde
dc.subject.classozHealth Policyen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozMikrozensusde
dc.subject.thesozmicrocensusen
dc.subject.thesozArzneimittelde
dc.subject.thesozpharmaceuticalen
dc.subject.thesozArzneimittelmarktde
dc.subject.thesozpharmaceutical marketen
dc.subject.thesozPreisde
dc.subject.thesozpriceen
dc.subject.thesozNutzende
dc.subject.thesozutilityen
dc.subject.thesozPreisbildungde
dc.subject.thesozformation of pricesen
dc.subject.thesozgesetzliche Krankenversicherungde
dc.subject.thesozcompulsory health insuranceen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-99877-1
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10052284
internal.identifier.thesoz10036777
internal.identifier.thesoz10036789
internal.identifier.thesoz10034835
internal.identifier.thesoz10045914
internal.identifier.thesoz10055115
internal.identifier.thesoz10045422
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo216-233de
internal.identifier.classoz11006
internal.identifier.journal3223
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133123000117de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record