Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorRöllicke, Lenade
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T10:09:14Z
dc.date.available2025-02-07T10:09:14Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn1873-6890de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/99785
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to contribute to the nascent field of research on affective polarisation in liberal democracies by reflecting on the conceptual ambiguities as well as potentials inherent in the concept. Based on a systematic, critical review of 78 articles, I discuss three main ambiguities in the current literature on affective polarisation in multi-party democracies. Those concern firstly, the object of dislike; secondly, the nature of dislike; and thirdly, how to make sense of the concept of "polarisation" in the context of affective polarisation. I then propose to use the existing ambiguities as a basis to work towards a more nuanced conceptualisation of affective polarisation which allows us to distinguish it from neighbouring concepts and to further differentiate between different constellations and degrees of affective polarisation. I conclude by arguing in favour of taking a broader approach to studying affective polarisation than done so far, and by suggesting some directions for future research.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherAffective Polarisation; Conceptualisationde
dc.titlePolarisation, identity and affect - conceptualising affective polarisation in multi-party systemsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalElectoral Studies
dc.source.volume85de
dc.publisher.countryNLDde
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozPolarisierungde
dc.subject.thesozpolarizationen
dc.subject.thesozAffektivitätde
dc.subject.thesozaffectivityen
dc.subject.thesozEmotionalitätde
dc.subject.thesozemotionalityen
dc.subject.thesozIdentitätde
dc.subject.thesozidentityen
dc.subject.thesozMehrparteiensystemde
dc.subject.thesozmulti-party systemen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionWZBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10063279
internal.identifier.thesoz10034669
internal.identifier.thesoz10034670
internal.identifier.thesoz10046991
internal.identifier.thesoz10054134
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal100
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102655de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.econstor.eu/oai/request@@oai:econstor.eu:10419/307644
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record