Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKarimzadeh, Abdollahde
dc.contributor.authorAmirifard, Parisade
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-31T12:40:53Z
dc.date.available2025-01-31T12:40:53Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2588-5502de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/99585
dc.description.abstractOne of the epistemological debates on Cyberethics is the ethical implications of indeterminacy in cyberspace which results from its inherent zero-infinity binary logic. Since this logic is both of linguistic and mathematical nature, we contend that it can be discursively problematized. The central question here is: how can cyberethics be talked about in light of the fact that the zero-one binary in the cyberspace is regenerated endlessly and infinitely despite our invariant situation? The second question to be touch upon is: How can the problem of indeterminacy in the cyberspace leads to a crisis in our real -world cognitive schemas? Given that the indeterminacy in the cyberspace originates from a syntactic shift in its verification-falsification logic, we argue that this logic can be problematized by Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem together with Cantor’s continuum hypothesis. To this end, the present paper situates itself within the axiomatic apparatus of these two scholars to rethink the cyberethics. It is an exploratory qualitative research, based on deductive approach, seeking to unearth an underresearched problem based on existing hypotheses. Methodologically, it is subsumed under library research for its drawing on books and theories that are directly relevant to the research problem at hand.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherbinary logic; cyberethics indeterminacy; cyberspace; incompleteness theoremde
dc.titleGödel and the Cyberspace: Rethinking Cyberethicsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Cyberspace Studies
dc.source.volume8de
dc.publisher.countryMISCde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozinteraktive, elektronische Mediende
dc.subject.classozInteractive, electronic Mediaen
dc.subject.classozWissenschaftssoziologie, Wissenschaftsforschung, Technikforschung, Techniksoziologiede
dc.subject.classozSociology of Science, Sociology of Technology, Research on Science and Technologyen
dc.subject.thesozInternetde
dc.subject.thesozInterneten
dc.subject.thesozEthikde
dc.subject.thesozethicsen
dc.subject.thesozLogikde
dc.subject.thesozlogicen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-99585-1
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040528
internal.identifier.thesoz10038485
internal.identifier.thesoz10043870
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo285-294de
internal.identifier.classoz1080404
internal.identifier.classoz10220
internal.identifier.journal1339
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22059/jcss.2024.371183.1099de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence32
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record