Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBogliacino, Francescode
dc.contributor.authorCharris, Rafaelde
dc.contributor.authorCodagnone, Cristianode
dc.contributor.authorFolkvord, Fransde
dc.contributor.authorGaskell, Georgede
dc.contributor.authorGómez, Camilode
dc.contributor.authorLiva, Giovannide
dc.contributor.authorMontealegre, Felipede
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-30T10:52:11Z
dc.date.available2025-01-30T10:52:11Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn0306-9192de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/99519
dc.description.abstractFood labels have been used extensively for informing consumers to make more rational and safer decisions. However, this carries the risk of confusing consumers with multiple claims which may distract from key information such as the country of origin of the product. To inform the European legislation, we have tested labels on fish and aquaculture products in three separate experiments, across several European Member States. The main results showed that mandatory information is better recalled than voluntary information. In addition, consumers perceive, and process differently labels for farmed and caught fish, relying more on quality claims for the former. Nonetheless, in both cases, while they value visual information, they are likely to be confused by voluntary claims including flags. Finally, when additional claims are added step by step, they lead to a decrease in accuracy of recall and comprehension. In sum, less is better, because too much information on food labels lead to cognitive overload and consumer confusion.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcÖkologiede
dc.subject.ddcEcologyen
dc.subject.otherfish; label; information overload; recall task; trustworthiness; Eurobarometer 89.3 (ZA7483 v1.0.0)de
dc.titleLess is more: Information overload in the labelling of fish and aquaculture productsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalFood Policy
dc.publisher.countryNLDde
dc.source.issue116
dc.subject.classozÖkologie und Umweltde
dc.subject.classozEcology, Environmenten
dc.subject.thesozKonsumde
dc.subject.thesozconsumptionen
dc.subject.thesozKonsumforschungde
dc.subject.thesozconsumer researchen
dc.subject.thesozVerbraucherde
dc.subject.thesozconsumeren
dc.subject.thesozErnährungde
dc.subject.thesoznutritionen
dc.subject.thesozNachhaltigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozsustainabilityen
dc.subject.thesozNahrungsmittelde
dc.subject.thesozfooden
dc.subject.thesozProduktde
dc.subject.thesozproducten
dc.subject.thesozFischverarbeitungde
dc.subject.thesozfish processingen
dc.subject.thesozEuropade
dc.subject.thesozEuropeen
dc.subject.thesozEurobarometerde
dc.subject.thesozEurobarometeren
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-99519-1
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035058
internal.identifier.thesoz10049643
internal.identifier.thesoz10048454
internal.identifier.thesoz10042567
internal.identifier.thesoz10064837
internal.identifier.thesoz10034841
internal.identifier.thesoz10034840
internal.identifier.thesoz10043731
internal.identifier.thesoz10042879
internal.identifier.thesoz10083052
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-17de
internal.identifier.classoz20900
internal.identifier.journal3254
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc577
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102435de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record