Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMenold, Nataljade
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-30T10:38:56Z
dc.date.available2025-01-30T10:38:56Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn1525-822Xde
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/99516
dc.description.abstractWhile numerical bipolar rating scales may evoke positivity bias, little is known about the corresponding bias in verbal bipolar rating scales. The choice of verbalization of the middle category may lead to response bias, particularly if it is not in line with the scale polarity. Unipolar and bipolar seven-category rating scales in which the verbalizations of the middle categories matched or did not match the implemented polarity were investigated in randomized experiments using a non-probabilistic online access panel in Germany. Bipolar rating scales exhibited higher positivity bias and acquiescence than unipolar rating scales. Reliability, validity, and equidistance tended to be violated if the verbalizations of the middle category did not match scale polarity. The results provide a rationale for rating scale verbalization.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherbipolare Skalen; unipolare Skalen; Gender-role attitudes (ISSP 94) (ZIS 223);de
dc.titleVerbalization of Rating Scales Taking Account of Their Polarityde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalField Methods
dc.source.volume35de
dc.publisher.countryUSAde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozRatingskalade
dc.subject.thesozrating scaleen
dc.subject.thesozValiditätde
dc.subject.thesozvalidityen
dc.subject.thesozReliabilitätde
dc.subject.thesozreliabilityen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozKategoriede
dc.subject.thesozcategoryen
dc.subject.thesozErhebungsmethodede
dc.subject.thesozdata collection methoden
dc.subject.thesozquantitative Methodede
dc.subject.thesozquantitative methoden
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-99516-0
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10055936
internal.identifier.thesoz10049626
internal.identifier.thesoz10056537
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10048669
internal.identifier.thesoz10037921
internal.identifier.thesoz10052183
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo378-391de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal1363
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X231151314de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence32
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record