dc.contributor.author | Munoz Rivas, Axel | de |
dc.contributor.author | Davis, Hilary | de |
dc.contributor.author | Pedell, Sonja | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-28T12:28:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-28T12:28:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2183-7635 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/99454 | |
dc.description.abstract | Australian rural communities face significant climate challenges including catastrophic bushfires. In line with the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs), to build resilience in the face of bushfire threats, communities need to increase adaptive capacity while maintaining the community's integrity. To build community resilience, they should harness the hybridity between digital technology and non-technological practices. Building community resilience is gaining attention in rural human-computer interaction to ensure those who are vulnerable to disasters strengthen their ability to address adversity even in the absence of formal government assistance. How they apply digital technology into practice to ensure it meets their needs is crucial. We outline a case study of a rural Australian bushfire-impacted community. A series of co-design workshops was conducted to understand local bushfire preparation activities and the role of digital technologies in these activities. Three creative participatory design activities supported the co-design of an early-warning bushfire system. The workshop participants co-designed and merged two solutions: first The Fire Tree, a conceptual map of a preventative information system fed and validated by the community itself; second, The People System identifies and harnesses government resources to feed and generate a rich, dynamic, and constantly updated information environment. The final solution based on the two concepts is Bushwire, a communication facilitator designed and used by participants in workshops four and five. Bushwire is a co-designed web-based collective platform that leverages citizen-science behaviours, enabling them to share local knowledge and prepare for bushfire threats. The system became a communication facilitator, a space to share detailed local information and connect; fed by locally produced elements including digital technologies, weather/road conditions, and on-the-ground instructions. This case study explores how Bushwire responds to a range of UN SDGs by seeking to build sustainable communities (SDG11), to address climate action (SDG13) for this rural Australian bush-fire-prone community, and harmonises life on land (SDG15) through multi-stakeholder partnerships (SDG17). We envisage that urban planners may derive value from listening and responding to messages from nature, and from citizen-scientists embedded in rural communities as depicted in this case study. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Städtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltung | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Landscaping and area planning | en |
dc.subject.other | bushfires; climate action; co-design; human-computer interaction; life on land; sustainable cities; sustainable communities; sustainable development goals | de |
dc.title | The People and the Fire Tree: Co-Designing a Bushfire Early Warning System to Meet the Sustainable Development Goals | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/9125/4190 | de |
dc.source.journal | Urban Planning | |
dc.source.volume | 10 | de |
dc.publisher.country | PRT | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Raumplanung und Regionalforschung | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Area Development Planning, Regional Research | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | nachhaltige Entwicklung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | sustainable development | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Nachhaltigkeit | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | sustainability | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Resilienz | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | resilience | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Klimaschutz | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | climate protection | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Australien | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Australia | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | ländlicher Raum | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | rural area | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | ländliche Entwicklung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | rural development | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Frühwarnsystem | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | early warning system | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Naturkatastrophe | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | natural disaster | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | bürgerschaftliches Engagement | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | citizens' involvement | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10062390 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10064837 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10082747 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10060614 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037448 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034789 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042256 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10044446 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10048664 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041513 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
internal.identifier.classoz | 20700 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 794 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 710 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | The Role of Participatory Planning and Design in Addressing the UN Sustainable Development Goals | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17645/up.9125 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/9125 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |