Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMunoz Rivas, Axelde
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Hilaryde
dc.contributor.authorPedell, Sonjade
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-28T12:28:13Z
dc.date.available2025-01-28T12:28:13Z
dc.date.issued2025de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/99454
dc.description.abstractAustralian rural communities face significant climate challenges including catastrophic bushfires. In line with the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs), to build resilience in the face of bushfire threats, communities need to increase adaptive capacity while maintaining the community's integrity. To build community resilience, they should harness the hybridity between digital technology and non-technological practices. Building community resilience is gaining attention in rural human-computer interaction to ensure those who are vulnerable to disasters strengthen their ability to address adversity even in the absence of formal government assistance. How they apply digital technology into practice to ensure it meets their needs is crucial. We outline a case study of a rural Australian bushfire-impacted community. A series of co-design workshops was conducted to understand local bushfire preparation activities and the role of digital technologies in these activities. Three creative participatory design activities supported the co-design of an early-warning bushfire system. The workshop participants co-designed and merged two solutions: first The Fire Tree, a conceptual map of a preventative information system fed and validated by the community itself; second, The People System identifies and harnesses government resources to feed and generate a rich, dynamic, and constantly updated information environment. The final solution based on the two concepts is Bushwire, a communication facilitator designed and used by participants in workshops four and five. Bushwire is a co-designed web-based collective platform that leverages citizen-science behaviours, enabling them to share local knowledge and prepare for bushfire threats. The system became a communication facilitator, a space to share detailed local information and connect; fed by locally produced elements including digital technologies, weather/road conditions, and on-the-ground instructions. This case study explores how Bushwire responds to a range of UN SDGs by seeking to build sustainable communities (SDG11), to address climate action (SDG13) for this rural Australian bush-fire-prone community, and harmonises life on land (SDG15) through multi-stakeholder partnerships (SDG17). We envisage that urban planners may derive value from listening and responding to messages from nature, and from citizen-scientists embedded in rural communities as depicted in this case study.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.otherbushfires; climate action; co-design; human-computer interaction; life on land; sustainable cities; sustainable communities; sustainable development goalsde
dc.titleThe People and the Fire Tree: Co-Designing a Bushfire Early Warning System to Meet the Sustainable Development Goalsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/9125/4190de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume10de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.thesoznachhaltige Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozsustainable developmenten
dc.subject.thesozNachhaltigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozsustainabilityen
dc.subject.thesozResilienzde
dc.subject.thesozresilienceen
dc.subject.thesozKlimaschutzde
dc.subject.thesozclimate protectionen
dc.subject.thesozAustraliende
dc.subject.thesozAustraliaen
dc.subject.thesozländlicher Raumde
dc.subject.thesozrural areaen
dc.subject.thesozländliche Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozrural developmenten
dc.subject.thesozFrühwarnsystemde
dc.subject.thesozearly warning systemen
dc.subject.thesozNaturkatastrophede
dc.subject.thesoznatural disasteren
dc.subject.thesozbürgerschaftliches Engagementde
dc.subject.thesozcitizens' involvementen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10062390
internal.identifier.thesoz10064837
internal.identifier.thesoz10082747
internal.identifier.thesoz10060614
internal.identifier.thesoz10037448
internal.identifier.thesoz10034789
internal.identifier.thesoz10042256
internal.identifier.thesoz10044446
internal.identifier.thesoz10048664
internal.identifier.thesoz10041513
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.source.issuetopicThe Role of Participatory Planning and Design in Addressing the UN Sustainable Development Goalsde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.9125de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/9125
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record