SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(309.9Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-98925-4

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

"Особо не до либидо": солидарности и политики сексуальности в низовых феминистских инициативах Петербурга

"Not so Much About Libido": Solidarities and Sexual Policies Grassroot Feminist Initiatives in Petersburg
[journal article]

Senkova, Olya A.

Abstract

Feminist sex wars began in the West in 1970-1980s and nowadays run on globally. The article takes sex wars into account and considers the construction of sexual policies and solidarities among the participants of the grassroots feminist initiatives in the modern Russia. The feminist debate about sex... view more

Feminist sex wars began in the West in 1970-1980s and nowadays run on globally. The article takes sex wars into account and considers the construction of sexual policies and solidarities among the participants of the grassroots feminist initiatives in the modern Russia. The feminist debate about sexuality is especially relevant in a conservative domestic context based on the construction of "traditional", "primordially-Russian" models ofsexuality in a binary dichotomy of the dominance of hyper-masculinity over non-subversive femininity. Within this discourse, sex and sexuality are reduced to the nation breeding's reproductive function. Using the analysis of 28 in-depth interviews with Petersburg feminists and participant ethnographic observation (32 days), I considerthe production ofsexual values by informants in the "risk /pleasure" continuum offered by Carol Vance, as well as emerging solidarities and exclusion mechanisms. Several solidarity lines have been found in the following continuums: participants' self-determination as "women" or "queer", aspirations to create male-free or LGBTIQ-inclusive space, the perceptions of commercial sex and BDSM in the continuum "violence-free choice". Within the framework of designated solidarities, there emerge such sexual dissidents as: LGBTIQ identifiable as men, sex-workers and commercial sex consumers, participants of BDSM practices. At the same time, the most important for informants category is the risk associated with possible violence. Meanwhile, the possibility of obtaining sexual pleasure and sexual expression in the absence ofsecurity is questionable.... view less

Keywords
gender studies; sexuality; feminism; solidarity; Russia; political movement

Classification
Women's Studies, Feminist Studies, Gender Studies
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture

Free Keywords
youth studies; gender studies; LGBTIQ; commercial sex

Document language
Russian

Publication Year
2018

Page/Pages
p. 79-100

Journal
Sociologija vlasti / Sociology of power, 30 (2018) 1

DOI
http://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2018-1-79-100

ISSN
2074-0492

Status
Published Version; reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.