Show simple item record

Happiness for All: A Forgotten Concept or a New Foundation of Social Order?
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorGoncharova, Olga O.de
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-10T07:40:11Z
dc.date.available2025-01-10T07:40:11Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn2074-0492de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/98917
dc.description.abstractThe article is devoted to the analysis of happiness as a category of social theory, which - at the beginning of the XXI century - became not only a new subject of sociological research but also the basis of government programs in several countries, including the United Kingdom. "Happiness" became the basis of social order due to a revival of the interest of modern scholars in the works of Jeremy Bentham and other philosophers of the Enlightenment. In these works were considered, among other things, the possibilities of achieving universal happiness. However, the real reason for the actualization of this category is its crisis in economic science caused by the "Easterlin paradox," that is, the absence of a direct and unequivocal correlation between income growth and the level of happiness of the population. The article provides a detailed analysis of the sources of the concept of happiness as a category of social order, primarily the work of the cameralists and Johann Heinrich Gottlieb Justi, the most famous representative of this school. The analysis demonstrates that the idea of happiness as the basis of social order has already been experienced in the period of cameralism when it was integrated into the work of the enlighteners. However, without further development, this idea eventually left the language of social sciences completely immersed in economic theory. One of the reasons for the decline of this category was the lack of "stable" mechanisms for including the happiness of individuals as a part of the common good, and therefore the impossibility of converting "happiness" from an existential into a social category. We provide an analysis of the reasons why none of the proposed theories of common happiness in the XVIII-XIX centuries was consistent. Even before the Enlightenment, the category survived the crisis in social theory and a return to it requires a serious rethinking in the context of the heritage of philosophers of the XVIII-XIX centuries.de
dc.languagerude
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophiede
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophyen
dc.subject.othercameralists; Justi; Smith; Enlightenmentde
dc.titleСчастье для всех: забытый концепт или новое основание социального порядка?de
dc.title.alternativeHappiness for All: A Forgotten Concept or a New Foundation of Social Order?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.journalSociologija vlasti / Sociology of power
dc.source.volume31de
dc.publisher.countryRUSde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozPhilosophie, Theologiede
dc.subject.classozPhilosophy, Ethics, Religionen
dc.subject.thesozGlückde
dc.subject.thesozhappinessen
dc.subject.thesozGemeinwohlde
dc.subject.thesozcommon gooden
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-98917-9
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10045833
internal.identifier.thesoz10044976
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo185-209de
internal.identifier.classoz30100
internal.identifier.journal2720
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc100
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2019-4-185-209de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
dc.subject.classhort30100de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record