Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorGherghina, Sergiude
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-06T12:52:26Z
dc.date.available2025-01-06T12:52:26Z
dc.date.issued2025de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/98817
dc.description.abstractThe literature discussing leadership style identifies great variation between contemporary party leaders. While much attention is devoted to their actions, portrayal in the media, and relationships with their followers, there is limited analysis of which factors make a party leader transformational or transactional. This article addresses this gap in the literature and seeks to identify the characteristics of the party leaders or of the party to which they belong which lead party members to evaluate them on the transactional–transformational continuum. It uses original survey data from a modified version of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. The analysis includes 12 political parties with parliamentary representation from Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania between 2004 and 2018. The findings illustrate that members perceive as more transformational the first leaders of the party, those who have won competitive internal elections, and those with extensive political experience within the party.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherleadership style; party leaders; post‐communism; transformationalde
dc.titleTransformational Party Leaders: Determinants of Leadership Style Assessment in Central and Eastern Europede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/9141/4149de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume13de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozOrganisationde
dc.subject.thesozorganizationen
dc.subject.thesozFührungsstilde
dc.subject.thesozmanagement styleen
dc.subject.thesozParteide
dc.subject.thesozpartyen
dc.subject.thesozBulgariende
dc.subject.thesozBulgariaen
dc.subject.thesozUngarnde
dc.subject.thesozHungaryen
dc.subject.thesozRumäniende
dc.subject.thesozRomaniaen
dc.subject.thesozpostsozialistisches Landde
dc.subject.thesozpost-socialist countryen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10034443
internal.identifier.thesoz10044487
internal.identifier.thesoz10036000
internal.identifier.thesoz10039961
internal.identifier.thesoz10060698
internal.identifier.thesoz10056959
internal.identifier.thesoz10035023
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.source.issuetopicLegitimacy and Followership in National and International Political Leadershipde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.9141de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/9141
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

No Thumbnail [100%x80]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record