Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBarth, Erlingde
dc.contributor.authorReisel, Lizade
dc.contributor.authorMisje Østbakken, Kjerstide
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-26T13:54:49Z
dc.date.available2024-11-26T13:54:49Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn1469-8722de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/98115
dc.description.abstractThis article revisits a central tenet of the welfare state paradox, also known as the inclusion-equality trade-off. Using large-scale survey data for 31 European countries and the United States, collected over a recent 15-year period, the article re-investigates the relationship between female labour force participation and gender segregation. Emphasising the transitional role played by the monetisation of domestic tasks, the study identifies a 'gender equality hurdle' that countries with the highest levels of female labour force participation have already passed. The results show that occupational gender segregation is currently lower in countries with high female labour force participation, regardless of public sector size. However, the findings also indicate that high relative levels of public spending on health, education and care are particularly conducive to desegregation. Hence, rather than being paradoxical, more equality in participation begets more equality in the labour market, as well as in gendered tasks in society overall.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherpublic sector; unpaid work; welfare state paradox; EU-SILC 2004-2019de
dc.titleThe Equality Hurdle: Resolving the Welfare State Paradoxde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalWork, Employment and Society
dc.source.volume38de
dc.publisher.countryUSAde
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozAllgemeines, spezielle Theorien und Schulen, Methoden, Entwicklung und Geschichte der Sozialpolitikde
dc.subject.classozBasic Research, General Concepts and History of Social Policyen
dc.subject.classozFrauen- und Geschlechterforschungde
dc.subject.classozWomen's Studies, Feminist Studies, Gender Studiesen
dc.subject.thesozWohlfahrtsstaatde
dc.subject.thesozwelfare stateen
dc.subject.thesozErwerbsbeteiligungde
dc.subject.thesozlabor force participationen
dc.subject.thesozFraude
dc.subject.thesozwomanen
dc.subject.thesozSegregationde
dc.subject.thesozsegregationen
dc.subject.thesozgeschlechtsspezifische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozgender-specific factorsen
dc.subject.thesozGleichstellungde
dc.subject.thesozaffirmative actionen
dc.subject.thesozinternationaler Vergleichde
dc.subject.thesozinternational comparisonen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-98115-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10058491
internal.identifier.thesoz10038841
internal.identifier.thesoz10038633
internal.identifier.thesoz10057624
internal.identifier.thesoz10045237
internal.identifier.thesoz10045798
internal.identifier.thesoz10047775
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo766-786de
internal.identifier.classoz11001
internal.identifier.classoz20200
internal.identifier.journal357
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231155293de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record