Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKalar, Barbarade
dc.contributor.authorPrimc, Kajade
dc.contributor.authorKump, Natašade
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-19T09:47:28Z
dc.date.available2024-11-19T09:47:28Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/97957
dc.description.abstractThis paper looks at the distribution of disposable income by deciles to indicate how specific mitigating measures have influenced income groups and considers the effectiveness of different combinations of containment measures in the European Union. Simulations using the EUROMOD tax-benefit microsimulation model imply that the mitigating effects of the simulated measures are regressive, with a bigger influence on the bottom part of the income distribution. It is also observed that old democracies benefit from these measures more than new democracies. Surprisingly, our results further reveal that for the two highest decile income groups, the COVID-19 containment measures are stronger in new democracies. Finally, a qualitative comparative analysis of 19 EU countries suggests that each country should apply mixes of containment measures that fit its own context. Although there is no one-size-fits-all policy, old democracies seem more successful at handling the consequences of the COVID-19 crisis than new democracies. This study complements the literature as it shows how COVID-19 measures have influenced household income groups, and second, it adds to earlier studies by clarifying that only specific context-dependent combinations of containment measures are successful at preventing the loss of people's living standards, thereby giving policymakers the necessary leeway to formulate effective policies.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherCOVID-19; microsimulation; qualitative comparative analysis; policy responses; EU-SILC 2018de
dc.titleDifferences in COVID-19 Policies and Income Distribution: A Cross-Country Comparisonde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSustainability
dc.source.volume15de
dc.publisher.countryCHEde
dc.source.issue6de
dc.subject.classozsoziale Sicherungde
dc.subject.classozSocial Securityen
dc.subject.thesozEinkommensverteilungde
dc.subject.thesozincome distributionen
dc.subject.thesozverfügbares Einkommende
dc.subject.thesozdisposable incomeen
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozhealth policyen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Unterstützungde
dc.subject.thesozsocial supporten
dc.subject.thesozSozialleistungde
dc.subject.thesozsocial benefitsen
dc.subject.thesozEUde
dc.subject.thesozEUen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-97957-5
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10041667
internal.identifier.thesoz10041646
internal.identifier.thesoz10045550
internal.identifier.thesoz10046612
internal.identifier.thesoz10035218
internal.identifier.thesoz10041441
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz11003
internal.identifier.journal1459
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su15064916de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record