SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(819.3Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-97790-7

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

The long-term effects of voting for autocracy: Evidence from Russia

[journal article]

Northmore-Ball, Ksenia
Tertytchnaya, Katerina

Abstract

Do different Russian generations differ in their propensity to vote? Drawing on evidence from Soviet and post-Soviet elections, we consider how early-life electoral experiences influence voters’ life-long voting propensity. The empirical analysis relies on a harmonized dataset of survey data coverin... view more

Do different Russian generations differ in their propensity to vote? Drawing on evidence from Soviet and post-Soviet elections, we consider how early-life electoral experiences influence voters’ life-long voting propensity. The empirical analysis relies on a harmonized dataset of survey data covering all national elections between 1991 and 2018. We estimate differences in turnout propensity across generations using several forms of age–period–cohort analysis including hierarchical age-period-cohort analysis and semi-parametric generalized additive models. Findings suggest that generations voting for the first time in elections taking place between 1946–1966 have a higher propensity to vote than others. Complementing quantitative evidence with extensive description, we propose that state-led mobilization efforts under Communism and the opportunity to vote in regularly held elections may account for these effects. Our research has implications for research on the consequences of authoritarian elections and their impact on long-term voter behaviour.... view less

Keywords
Russia; voting behavior; generation; post-socialist country; authoritarian system; voter turnout; political socialization; post-communist society; longitudinal study; election result

Classification
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture

Free Keywords
post-communist; generational replacement; authoritarian elections; habit formation; International Social Survey Programme: Citizenship - ISSP 2004 (ZA3950); International Social Survey Programme: Religion III - ISSP 2008 (ZA4950); International Social Survey Programme: Family and Changing Gender Roles IV - ISSP 2012 (ZA5900); International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government V - ISSP 2016 (ZA6900)

Document language
English

Publication Year
2023

Page/Pages
p. 1-11

Journal
Electoral Studies, 83 (2023)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102618

ISSN
0261-3794

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.