Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorChen, Xueyingde
dc.contributor.authorFan, Lide
dc.contributor.authorCao, Zhikuide
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T10:21:01Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T10:21:01Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/97641
dc.description.abstractA great number of creative industrial parks (CIPs) have emerged in the past two decades in China as a critical and popular approach to the adaptive reuse of abandoned industrial land in cities. However, a few vibrant CIPs have been closed in the past few years, and the sites are set to be demolished and redeveloped in a property-led manner, suggesting the fragility of CIPs as a land reuse approach. This article aims to elaborate on the institutional rationale behind such a phenomenon. Cases in Shanghai and Guangzhou are examined and presented. The key arguments include: (a) in the industrial land redevelopment process, public and private actors flexibly establish pro-coalitions and contra-coalitions to foster and close CIPs, with strategies to overcome institutional obstacles and to implement land redevelopment-pursued regulatory plans, respectively; (b) key actors forming the two coalitions overlap, such as the local government and the state-owned enterprise land occupiers, and their positions shift subject to specific circumstances; and (c) the finding of the two coalitions echoes the existing argument that there are forces beyond the growth machine driving China’s urban development and provides further insight into the explicit framework of the dual forces underneath.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.otherGuangzhou; Shanghai; creative industrial parks; industrial land redevelopment; pro- and contra-coalitionde
dc.titlePro- and Contra-Coalition: Governing the Rise and Fall of Creative Industrial Parks in Chinade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/8097/3956de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozFlächennutzungde
dc.subject.thesozarea utilizationen
dc.subject.thesozBetriebsansiedlungde
dc.subject.thesozindustrial parken
dc.subject.thesozStadtentwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozurban developmenten
dc.subject.thesozIndustrieansiedlungde
dc.subject.thesozindustrial settlementen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10043740
internal.identifier.thesoz10038905
internal.identifier.thesoz10042244
internal.identifier.thesoz10038906
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.source.issuetopicIndustrial Heritage and Cultural Clusters: More Than A Temporary Affair?de
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.8097de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/8097
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record