Show simple item record

Max Weber on "Freedom from Value Judgments" and "Sobriety of Judgment": From the Moral Strength of Universities to the Strength of "Personality"
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPresnyakov, Ilya V.de
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-23T09:05:08Z
dc.date.available2024-10-23T09:05:08Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2074-0492de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/97336
dc.description.abstractPresent paper is dedicated to categories of "freedom from value judgments" and "sobriety of judgment" in Max Weber's theory. The author examines them in three contexts: as a logical principle of science, as Weber's position in university politics, and as elements of his conceptions of "personality" and "life conduct". The author shows that the principle of "freedom" as a logical requirement is a necessary but insufficient condition for objectivity in social sciences. In actuality, it aims to separate the heterogeneous spheres of facts and practical judgments. However, an implementation of this separation in research practice cannot be realized without other elements of Weber's logical-methodological arsenal: value interpretation and nomological knowledge. At the same time, the internal structure of ideal types turns out to be insufficient to preserve the objectivity of judgments, if they turn into logically perfect, but still practical "samples". Therefore, the demand for "freedom from value judgments" and the personal readiness of scientists to follow exclusively the values of science again becomes necessary and functionally significant. In the context of university politics, the lack of academic self-control in evaluations undermines the moral strength of educational institutions and the unity of the university system. That is why abstinence in practical evaluations becomes a tool for Weber to reassemble the construction of "academic freedom" proposed by Karl von Amira. At the same time, "freedom from value judgments" is a condition for the independence and dignity of scientists as "personalities" in science. Moreover, the lack of a "sobriety of judgment" and the inability to consciously serve the chosen matter is a threat, according to Weber, to the consistent "life conduct" of the modern person. The author concludes that the participation of a young Weber in the organization of courses in 1893 dedicated to the high-quality theoretical training of clergy can be considered as one of his first steps in posing the problems of the "sobriety of judgment" and rational "life conduct" - in this case, of scientists and the clergy. The translation of Weber's small newspaper article about the upcoming courses, presented in the present issue of "Sociology of Power", thus expands the conventional and common set of Weber's texts concerning the problems of "freedom from value judgments" and "sobriety of judgment".de
dc.languagerude
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherfreedom from value judgments; sobriety of judgment; academic freedom; university politics; life conductde
dc.titleМакс Вебер о "свободе от оценки" и "трезвости суждений": от моральной силы университетов к силе "личности"de
dc.title.alternativeMax Weber on "Freedom from Value Judgments" and "Sobriety of Judgment": From the Moral Strength of Universities to the Strength of "Personality"de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.journalSociologija vlasti / Sociology of power
dc.source.volume33de
dc.publisher.countryRUSde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozGenerelle Theorien der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozGeneral Concepts, Major Hypotheses and Major Theories in the Social Sciencesen
dc.subject.thesozPersönlichkeitde
dc.subject.thesozpersonalityen
dc.subject.thesozHochschulpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozuniversity policyen
dc.subject.thesozWeber, M.de
dc.subject.thesozWeber, M.en
dc.subject.thesozUrteilde
dc.subject.thesozjudgment or sentenceen
dc.subject.thesozFreiheitde
dc.subject.thesozfreedomen
dc.subject.thesozObjektivitätde
dc.subject.thesozobjectivityen
dc.subject.thesozForschungspraxisde
dc.subject.thesozresearch practiceen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-97336-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10047174
internal.identifier.thesoz10039479
internal.identifier.thesoz10062015
internal.identifier.thesoz10045084
internal.identifier.thesoz10038509
internal.identifier.thesoz10053503
internal.identifier.thesoz10043965
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo217-236de
internal.identifier.classoz10103
internal.identifier.journal2720
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-4-217-236de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
dc.subject.classhort10200de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record