Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorWerner, Annikade
dc.contributor.authorHeinisch, Reinhardde
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-22T14:23:36Z
dc.date.available2024-10-22T14:23:36Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/97306
dc.description.abstractDo people support ostensibly effective policy measures that curtail liberal rights and civil liberties or instead stick to liberal principles when confronted with an unprecedented crisis? This article examines the relationship between individuals' perceptions of the Covid-19 pandemic and their attitudes toward democracy as they consider effective countermeasures. It asks (a) whether individuals' sense of being affected by the pandemic shapes their attitudes toward democratic policymaking and (b) whether this relationship is moderated by trust and authoritarianism. The analysis builds on a customized survey in Austria that includes a conjoint experiment to test the acceptability of various illiberal policies. It shows that while feeling affected by Covid-19 does not have the hypothesized effect, there are strong interactions with respondents' political attitudes. Citizens' willingness to sacrifice democracy for more effective policies depends both on whether they perceive the pandemic as a personal problem and on their attitudes toward government and democracy.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.otherCovid‐19 pandemic; public policy attitudes; survey experimentde
dc.titleDemocracy Amid Pandemic: A Survey Experiment on How Covid‐19 Affectedness Influences Support for Anti‐Liberal Policiesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/8469/3986de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume12de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.thesozÖsterreichde
dc.subject.thesozAustriaen
dc.subject.thesozKrisede
dc.subject.thesozcrisisen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.subject.thesozEpidemiede
dc.subject.thesozepidemicen
dc.subject.thesozStaatstätigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozpublic policyen
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Einstellungde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical attitudeen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040166
internal.identifier.thesoz10042064
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz10042424
internal.identifier.thesoz10059003
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10041739
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
dc.source.issuetopicChallenging Democracy: How Do Ideas of Populists and Disenchanted Citizens Align?de
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8469de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/8469
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record