Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorEnyedi, Zsoltde
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-22T12:48:02Z
dc.date.available2024-10-22T12:48:02Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/97290
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses various conceptualizations of illiberalism and adopts a definition that equates the concept with the negation of three liberal democratic principles: limited power, a neutral state, and an open society. The second part of the article explores the implications of this definitional strategy for empirical research, describes the relationship between populism, authoritarianism, and illiberalism, and identifies nine distinct routes to illiberalism: authoritarian, traditionalist, religious, libertarian, nativist-nationalist, populist, paternalist, materialist-technocratic, and left-wing.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.ddcStaatsformen und Regierungssystemede
dc.subject.ddcSystems of governments & statesen
dc.subject.otherilliberalism; liberal democracy; state neutralityde
dc.titleConcept and Varieties of Illiberalismde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/8521/3911de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume12de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozStaat, staatliche Organisationsformende
dc.subject.classozPolitical System, Constitution, Governmenten
dc.subject.thesozAutoritarismusde
dc.subject.thesozauthoritarianismen
dc.subject.thesozPopulismusde
dc.subject.thesozpopulismen
dc.subject.thesozLiberalismusde
dc.subject.thesozliberalismen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.subject.thesozNeutralitätde
dc.subject.thesozneutralityen
dc.subject.thesozoffene Gesellschaftde
dc.subject.thesozopen societyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037551
internal.identifier.thesoz10055018
internal.identifier.thesoz10051198
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz10053207
internal.identifier.thesoz10045284
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.classoz10503
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc321
dc.source.issuetopicChallenging Democracy: How Do Ideas of Populists and Disenchanted Citizens Align?de
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8521de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/8521
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record