dc.contributor.author | Enyedi, Zsolt | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-22T12:48:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-22T12:48:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2183-2463 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/97290 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article discusses various conceptualizations of illiberalism and adopts a definition that equates the concept with the negation of three liberal democratic principles: limited power, a neutral state, and an open society. The second part of the article explores the implications of this definitional strategy for empirical research, describes the relationship between populism, authoritarianism, and illiberalism, and identifies nine distinct routes to illiberalism: authoritarian, traditionalist, religious, libertarian, nativist-nationalist, populist, paternalist, materialist-technocratic, and left-wing. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Staatsformen und Regierungssysteme | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Systems of governments & states | en |
dc.subject.other | illiberalism; liberal democracy; state neutrality | de |
dc.title | Concept and Varieties of Illiberalism | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/8521/3911 | de |
dc.source.journal | Politics and Governance | |
dc.source.volume | 12 | de |
dc.publisher.country | PRT | de |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Staat, staatliche Organisationsformen | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political System, Constitution, Government | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Autoritarismus | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | authoritarianism | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Populismus | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | populism | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Liberalismus | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | liberalism | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Demokratie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | democracy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Neutralität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | neutrality | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | offene Gesellschaft | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | open society | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037551 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10055018 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10051198 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037672 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10053207 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045284 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10503 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 787 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 321 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | Challenging Democracy: How Do Ideas of Populists and Disenchanted Citizens Align? | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8521 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/8521 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |