Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorArviana, Yustia Nerissade
dc.contributor.authorMasykur, Mohammad Hamidide
dc.contributor.authorSjafi'i, Imam Hamidide
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-18T10:10:20Z
dc.date.available2024-10-18T10:10:20Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2413-9009de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/97173
dc.description.abstractThis research discusses the legal implications of the notary's position as a defendant in a lawsuit to cancel a testamentary grant deed made by him as the deed of parties. Notaries are responsible for ensuring that every deed they make meets the quality and validity standards set by Law. The method used in this research is normative juridical research, which, in this case, can be done by examining various laws and regulations governing the role and responsibilities of notaries in making and cancelling testamentary grant deeds. In cancelling a testamentary grant deed, notaries can face various legal consequences, including administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions, if proven to have committed violations or negligence in making the deed. In addition, notaries are also responsible for storing and archiving deeds properly to ensure that they can be accessed for future legal purposes. This article also examines the legal protections that notaries can take to maintain the integrity of their profession and avoid potential lawsuits. By complying with legal procedures, ensuring the quality and validity of deeds, and implementing strict operational standards in storage and archiving, notaries can minimise legal risks and maintain public trust in their profession.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcRechtde
dc.subject.ddcLawen
dc.subject.otherNotary; Deed of Testamentary Grant; Deed Cancellation; Legal Implication; Legal Protectionde
dc.titleLegal Implications of the Position of the Defendant Notary in a Law-suit to Cancel a Deed of Bequest as the Deed of Partiesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/3240/1550de
dc.source.journalPath of Science
dc.source.volume10de
dc.publisher.countryMISCde
dc.source.issue9de
dc.subject.classozRechtde
dc.subject.classozLawen
dc.subject.thesozNotarde
dc.subject.thesoznotary publicen
dc.subject.thesozRechtsschutzde
dc.subject.thesozlegal protectionen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10053381
internal.identifier.thesoz10056161
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo2001-2012de
internal.identifier.classoz40101
internal.identifier.journal1570
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc340
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22178/pos.108-2de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://pathofscience.org/index.php/index/oai/@@oai:ojs.pathofscience.org:article/3240
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

No Thumbnail [100%x80]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record