dc.contributor.author | Bykov, Evgenii M. | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-09T05:56:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-09T05:56:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2074-0492 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/97030 | |
dc.description.abstract | Based on self-reports of people with magnet implants, I investigate a pair of correlational questions: "How do technologically modified humans signify their new experience?" and "How do we, non-modified readers, become able to conceive it?". In answering the first question I start with biosemiotics. It considers signs being embedded in the morphology of an organism. On the one side, a magnet becomes a part of a human morphology and bodily schema; on the other - unlike most living organisms, humans can vary signs arbitrarily. I switch the theoretical exposition of the relation between signs, the human body, and technology to Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of perception, based on whose work Ihde conducted a phenomenological analysis of 4 regimes of technological mediations within the "I - World" correlation. His scheme was extended by Verbeek, who adds "cyborg relation" to the list. In the second part of the paper, I apply a vocabulary of material semiotics to the analysis of the "I/magnet" association. I separate quotes of MI-agents into several stages of existence of the association in question: emergence; interactions with constant magnets; interactions with electromagnetic devices; learning through others; actual non-expected associations; sense-formation; new risks of disruption of associations; normalization. I conclude with an attempt to answer 2nd initial question, about our (readers) conceivability by appealing to Barsalou's "perceptual symbol systems" approach, with the help of which I correlate synesthesia of MI-agents and semiosis - which transforms the field of meaning for a non-modified person. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | technological modification; magnet implants; semiosis; biosemiotics; material semiotics; phenomenology of technology; cyborg intentionality; Ihde | de |
dc.title | Ассоциация "Я/магнит": как люди с магнитными имплантами описывают свой новый опыт | de |
dc.title.alternative | "I/Magnet" Association: How Do People with Magnet Implants Signify Their New Experience | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet | de |
dc.description.review | reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Sociologija vlasti / Sociology of power | |
dc.source.volume | 35 | de |
dc.publisher.country | RUS | de |
dc.source.issue | 2 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Wissenschaftstheorie, Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Wissenschaftslogik, Ethik der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Philosophy of Science, Theory of Science, Methodology, Ethics of the Social Sciences | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Semiotik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | semiotics | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-97030-6 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10057787 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 62-85 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10102 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 2720 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-2-62-85 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 20 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 2 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 20500 | de |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |