Download full text
(400.0Kb)
Citation Suggestion
Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-97018-7
Exports for your reference manager
Трансформации политического воображаемого в постсоветской Центральной Азии: случаи Кыргызстана и Таджикистана
Transformations of the Political Imaginary in PostSoviet Central Asia: The Cases of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan
[journal article]
Abstract The paper examines the structure and dynamics of the political imaginary of the two countries of post-Soviet Central Asia Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. As the authors show, Russia has a special place in this structure. For a long time, many ordinary citizens of these states did not perceive Russia as a... view more
The paper examines the structure and dynamics of the political imaginary of the two countries of post-Soviet Central Asia Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. As the authors show, Russia has a special place in this structure. For a long time, many ordinary citizens of these states did not perceive Russia as a foreign state on an equal footing with others. This perception was due to a number of factors, the most important of which was Soviet institutional and psychological inertia. At the institutional level, Soviet inertia was expressed primarily in the transparency of the borders between Russia and the Central Asian countries. On a psychological level, it manifested itself in nostalgia for the Soviet past. It was the overlapping of soviet nostalgia with the understanding of the importance of migration to Russia for the material well-being of households that gave rise to a high level of loyalty to Moscow. Recently, however, the Russian Federation has started to gradually become a foreign state among others in the eyes of ordinary residents of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. In the minds of people, Russia still has a specific status, but this specificity is increasingly seen in a global context; in this context, other actors along with Moscow matter (Beijing and Washington, as well as Istanbul and Tehran). The process of turning Russia into an ordinary "abroad" was going on before, but it accelerated sharply after February 24, 2022. The authors identify signs of distancing from Russia both at the level of the ruling elites and at the level of civil society. Among these signs are, in particular, the desire of governments to demonstrate a multi-vector foreign policy, a change in the public rhetoric of top officials, as well as manifestations of anti-Russian sentiment in the public sphere of Kyrgyzstan.... view less
Keywords
Russia; sovereignty; national identity; Kyrgyzstan; Central Asia; Tajikistan
Classification
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture
Cultural Sociology, Sociology of Art, Sociology of Literature
Free Keywords
political imaginary
Document language
Russian
Publication Year
2023
Page/Pages
p. 160-189
Journal
Sociologija vlasti / Sociology of power, 35 (2023) 1
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-1-160-189
ISSN
2074-0492
Status
Published Version; reviewed
Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0