Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorUfimtseva, Anastasiade
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jingde
dc.contributor.authorShapiro, Daniel M.de
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-27T10:16:44Z
dc.date.available2024-09-27T10:16:44Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/96864
dc.description.abstractWe examine the geoeconomic strategies of the US regarding critical minerals through the lens of geopolitical rivalry with China. Chinese companies, mostly state-owned enterprises, play a prominent role in the extraction and processing of minerals critical to the energy transition. Drawing on the balance of power theory, we argue that the US, the incumbent hegemon, can employ both domestic policies and alliance-building strategies to counterbalance China's dominance in critical mineral sectors. Empirically, we first assess the nature of US domestic policies with respect to promoting domestic critical mineral production and restricting foreign investment in the extractive sectors through investment screening measures, and then assess the degree to which the US has relied on Five Eyes alliance partners to achieve common strategic goals. We find evidence that the US uses a multifaceted geoeconomic approach involving domestic policies and alliance strategies to counterbalance China's dominant position in critical mineral supply chains.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.otherChina-US rivalry; Five Eyes; critical minerals; geoeconomics; state‐owned enterprisesde
dc.titleUS Critical Mineral Policies and Alliance Strategies in an Age of Geopolitical Rivalryde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/8186/3841de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume12de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozspezielle Ressortpolitikde
dc.subject.classozSpecial areas of Departmental Policyen
dc.subject.classozVolkswirtschaftstheoriede
dc.subject.classozNational Economyen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozUSAde
dc.subject.thesozUnited States of Americaen
dc.subject.thesozWeltwirtschaftde
dc.subject.thesozworld economyen
dc.subject.thesozinternationaler Wettbewerbde
dc.subject.thesozinternational competitionen
dc.subject.thesozvolkseigener Betriebde
dc.subject.thesozstate-owned firm (GDR)en
dc.subject.thesozEnergieerzeugungde
dc.subject.thesozenergy productionen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10041244
internal.identifier.thesoz10037394
internal.identifier.thesoz10047903
internal.identifier.thesoz10061656
internal.identifier.thesoz10042059
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10508
internal.identifier.classoz1090301
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc330
dc.source.issuetopicThe Geoeconomic Turn in International Trade, Investment, and Technologyde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8186de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/8186
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record