SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(2.008Mb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-96601-1

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Economy and national security: US foreign economic policy under Trump and Biden

Wirtschaft und nationale Sicherheit: US-Außenwirtschaftspolitik unter Trump und Biden
[working paper]

Daniels, Laura von

Corporate Editor
Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit

Abstract

The United States sees the rise of authoritarian China as the primary risk to its national security and the global order. US foreign policy views the economy across party lines as being part of "national security" - especially vis-à-vis China. In its competition with China, the United States is incr... view more

The United States sees the rise of authoritarian China as the primary risk to its national security and the global order. US foreign policy views the economy across party lines as being part of "national security" - especially vis-à-vis China. In its competition with China, the United States is increasingly resorting to coercive economic instruments, some of which can also apply to companies in third countries. These are primarily tariffs, financial sanctions as well as export and investment controls. Industrial policy, including large-scale subsidies, complements these defensive economic measures. US allies and economic partners see both coercive economic measures and industrial policy as challenges. Biden's customised technology controls ("small yard, high fence" approach) are being met with scepticism concerning their scope, practi­cability and effectiveness. Biden's new industrial policy was seen as a risk to the economic base of the European Union and was introduced at a particularly bad time - when European industry is struggling most with energy price increases and rising production costs. In this situation, the European Commission has rightly initiated a process to focus on the EU's own vulnerabilities and to strengthen the coordination of external economic policy decision processes beyond trade policy. Regard­less of the outcome of the US presidential election in 2024 - and in order to reduce dependence on an authoritarian China - the European Commission and the governments of the member states should work together with companies to further develop de-risking strategies and to control critical technologies. The Commission's recently published package of measures on economic security is an important step in this direction. The next European Commission should set up an Economic Security Coun­cil to independently assess issues relevant to the EU's security and economy and enable faster and better informed decisions by the member states. (author's abstract)... view less

Keywords
United States of America; international trade policy; pressure-group politics; economic relations; national security; security policy; protectionism; economic policy; trade policy

Classification
International Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policy

Free Keywords
Sicherheitsstrategie; Sicherheitspolitische Interessen

Document language
English

Publication Year
2024

City
Berlin

Page/Pages
40 p.

Series
SWP Research Paper, 11/2024

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18449/2024RP11

ISSN
1863-1053

Status
Published Version; reviewed

Licence
Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.