Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorReis, Dorotade
dc.contributor.authorKrautter, Kaide
dc.contributor.authorHart, Alexanderde
dc.contributor.authorFriese, Maltede
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T14:07:52Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T14:07:52Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn1532-2998de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/95271
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a prolonged global crisis, but its effects on mental health seem inconsistent. This inconsistency highlights the importance of considering the differential impact of the pandemic on individuals. There is some evidence that mental health trajectories are heterogeneous and that both sociodemographic and personal characteristics are associated with higher risk for mental health issues. By contrast, information on the role of social factors as potential determinants of initial reactions to the pandemic and on heterogeneous trajectories over time is lacking. We analysed seven assessments of a large-scale (N = 2203) longitudinal study across 1.5 years, beginning in March 2020. Using self-report data on mental health and life satisfaction, we applied latent change models to examine initial reactions and mean changes across the pandemic. In addition, we applied latent class growth analyses to investigate whether there were distinct groups with different patterns of change. Results showed that on average, levels of life satisfaction and anxiety decreased (d = -0.31 and d = -0.11, respectively), levels of depressive symptoms increased (d = 0.13), and stress levels remained unchanged (d = -0.01) during the first year of the pandemic. For each outcome, we identified four distinct mental health trajectories. Between 5% (for anxiety) and 11% (for life satisfaction) of the sample reported consistently high - and even increasing - impairments in mental health and well-being. The trajectories of a sizeable number of people covaried with the course of the pandemic, such that people experienced better mental health when the number of COVID cases was low and when fewer restrictions were placed on public life. Low emotional support, high instrumental support, and the tendency to compare oneself with others were associated with more mental health issues. Findings show that whereas a substantial portion of people were largely unaffected by the pandemic, some individuals experienced consistently high levels of psychological distress. Social factors appear to play a crucial role in the maintenance of well-being.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.subject.otherCorona; COVID-19; Coronavirus; individual trajectories; latent change analysis; latent class growth analysis; mental health; ZIS 147de
dc.titleHeterogeneity in mental health change during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: The role of social factorsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalStress and Health
dc.source.volume39de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozpsychische Störungen, Behandlung und Präventionde
dc.subject.classozPsychological Disorders, Mental Health Treatment and Preventionen
dc.subject.thesozEpidemiede
dc.subject.thesozepidemicen
dc.subject.thesozInfektionskrankheitde
dc.subject.thesozcontagious diseaseen
dc.subject.thesozpsychische Gesundheitde
dc.subject.thesozmental healthen
dc.subject.thesozpsychische Belastungde
dc.subject.thesozpsychological stressen
dc.subject.thesozpsychische Folgende
dc.subject.thesozpsychological consequencesen
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitde
dc.subject.thesozhealthen
dc.subject.thesozWohlbefindende
dc.subject.thesozwell-beingen
dc.subject.thesozAngstde
dc.subject.thesozanxietyen
dc.subject.thesozStressde
dc.subject.thesozpsychophysical stressen
dc.subject.thesozDepressionde
dc.subject.thesozdepressionen
dc.subject.thesozLebenszufriedenheitde
dc.subject.thesozsatisfaction with lifeen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsocial factorsen
dc.subject.thesozSelbsteinschätzungde
dc.subject.thesozself-assessmenten
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-95271-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10042424
internal.identifier.thesoz10047305
internal.identifier.thesoz10055619
internal.identifier.thesoz10038092
internal.identifier.thesoz10043852
internal.identifier.thesoz10045492
internal.identifier.thesoz10045580
internal.identifier.thesoz10035666
internal.identifier.thesoz10036144
internal.identifier.thesoz10040750
internal.identifier.thesoz10050732
internal.identifier.thesoz10045241
internal.identifier.thesoz10057698
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo272-284de
internal.identifier.classoz10708
internal.identifier.journal2960
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc150
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3181de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record