Download full text
(external source)
Citation Suggestion
Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i6.95877
Exports for your reference manager
Responsive Research and Scientific Autonomy
[journal article]
Abstract
Von Schomberg's call to place mutual responsiveness - which I understand as the ability of researchers and the research system as a whole to foster meaningful exchanges and learn from novel experiences, no matter where those originate - at the core of Open Science and related efforts to reform the s... view more
Von Schomberg's call to place mutual responsiveness - which I understand as the ability of researchers and the research system as a whole to foster meaningful exchanges and learn from novel experiences, no matter where those originate - at the core of Open Science and related efforts to reform the scientific landscape is both timely and significant. Widespread sharing is not enough to guarantee responsible and inclusive research, nor are vague appeals to improve research culture, whatever it is that such culture may turn out to include (Leonelli, 2023). Rather, emphasis needs to be placed on the conditions under which sharing materials, methods and insights - and debating the goals and directions towards which these may be put to use - may improve research exchange, communication and scrutiny, resulting in scientific outputs that are both reliable and socially responsive. Hence von Schomberg's focus on the interplay between institutional and behavioural features of science and his plea for a reform in governance structures, such as initiated by COARA, are very well-taken. He is, however, too quick to dismiss the importance of some degree of autonomy for those involved in creating knowledge. To show why this matters, I here briefly discuss two of von Schomberg's additional claims: (1) his focus on 'knowledge actors' as the protagonists of research efforts; and (2) his critique of the effectiveness of self-governance efforts by researchers.... view less
Keywords
science; research; autonomy
Classification
Sociology of Science, Sociology of Technology, Research on Science and Technology
Free Keywords
open science; research values; scientific integrity; research assessment
Document language
English
Publication Year
2024
Page/Pages
p. 62-67
Journal
NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation (2024) 6
Issue topic
Towards a New Ethos of Science or a Reform of the Institution of Science?
ISSN
2562-7147
Status
Published Version; peer reviewed
Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0