Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorNikulin, Aleksandrde
dc.contributor.authorTrotsuk, Irinade
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-21T08:53:40Z
dc.date.available2024-05-21T08:53:40Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2500-1809de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/94181
dc.description.abstractA science-based conversation about the current state of rural areas, prospects for rural human capital and trends in rural differentiation is impossible without the conceptual approaches and futuristic projects of great Russian agrarian scientists. The article presents an attempt of comparing such ideas of two outstanding social thinkers of the early 20th century - Alexander Bogdanov and Alexander Chayanov, focusing on their utopias as representing the essential features (proletarian and peasant) of their social-economic and cultural-ethical views. Bogdanov and Chayanov had extensive encyclopedic knowledge and brilliant organizational skills; they wrote original works on social philosophy and political economy; both were prominent leaders of alternative social-political directions of the Russian Revolution. Moreover, Bogdanov and Chayanov wrote several famous utopias: Bogdanov's utopia develops Marxist ideas of proletarian revolution and construction of socialism not only on earth but also in space; Chayanov's utopia of moderate cooperative socialism defends the new revolutionary significance of the peasantry. The proletarian ideologist Bogdanov was skeptical about the political potential of the peasantry, arguing that opponents of proletarian revolution would use peasant conservatism against socialist revolution. The peasant ideologist Chayanov was skeptical about the creative potential of the working class, predicting that in the coming social revolution it would be used to build authoritarian-bureaucratic socialism. However, both thinkers sought prospects for rural-urban development through the analysis of possible ways of interaction between man and nature. Despite the ignorance of the positive revolutionary potential of the proletariat (Chayanov) and the peasantry (Bogdanov), both thinkers made huge contributions to the theory and practice of the Russian Revolution, and their utopian ideas still inspire the search for a new just, humane and happy world.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.otherChayanov; Bogdanov; peasantry; corporatism; colonialismde
dc.titleUtopias of Alexander Bogdanov and Alexander Chayanov: The choice of rural-urban development and its consequences for rural human capital and social differentiationde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalRussian Peasant Studies
dc.source.volume8de
dc.publisher.countryRUSde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozAllgemeines, spezielle Theorien und Schulen, Methoden, Entwicklung und Geschichte der Wirtschaftswissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozBasic Research, General Concepts and History of Economicsen
dc.subject.thesozländlicher Raumde
dc.subject.thesozrural areaen
dc.subject.thesozländliche Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozrural developmenten
dc.subject.thesozHumankapitalde
dc.subject.thesozhuman capitalen
dc.subject.thesozAgrarwissenschaftde
dc.subject.thesozagronomyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Ökonomiede
dc.subject.thesozpolitical economyen
dc.subject.thesozProletariatde
dc.subject.thesozproletariaten
dc.subject.thesozBauerde
dc.subject.thesozpeasanten
dc.subject.thesozMarxismusde
dc.subject.thesozMarxismen
dc.subject.thesozSozialismusde
dc.subject.thesozsocialismen
dc.subject.thesozUtopiede
dc.subject.thesozutopiaen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-94181-7
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10034789
internal.identifier.thesoz10042256
internal.identifier.thesoz10046926
internal.identifier.thesoz10034887
internal.identifier.thesoz10054839
internal.identifier.thesoz10055468
internal.identifier.thesoz10037693
internal.identifier.thesoz10034943
internal.identifier.thesoz10040693
internal.identifier.thesoz10060979
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo23-40de
internal.identifier.classoz10901
internal.identifier.journal2686
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc330
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort10400de
dc.subject.classhort50200de
dc.subject.classhort10900de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record