Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorChristmann, Pablode
dc.contributor.authorGummer, Tobiasde
dc.contributor.authorHäring, Armandode
dc.contributor.authorKunz, Tanjade
dc.contributor.authorOehrlein, Anne-Sophiede
dc.contributor.authorRuland, Michaelde
dc.contributor.authorSchmid, Lisade
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-02T11:15:35Z
dc.date.available2024-04-02T11:15:35Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2325-0992de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/93545
dc.description.abstractDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, many survey programs switched to self-administered modes of data collection, often offering respondents both web-based and paper-based questionnaires. However, there is little guidance as to when to offer which mode, especially when the aim is to recruit participants for a panel survey. This study examines the effectiveness of different mode-sequence designs by analyzing an experiment implemented in the recruitment wave of the German panel study "Family Research and Demographic Analysis." We randomly assigned 108,256 individuals aged 18-49 years to one of three mode-sequence-design conditions: concurrent, web-first including a paper-based questionnaire with the second reminder (web-first-2), and web-first including a paper-based questionnaire with the third reminder (web-first-3). A fourth, simulated group did not receive a paper-based questionnaire (web-only). We analyzed how different mode-sequence designs affected outcome rates, sample composition, response distributions, data quality, share of paper-based questionnaires, postage costs, number of postal mailings in the recruitment wave, and participation in the first regular wave. Our results show no differences in response distributions and small differences in sample composition across the four mode-sequence designs. As the web-first-2 and simulated web-only designs yielded comparatively good response and recruitment rates at reasonable costs, we recommend their use when surveying adults between 18 and 49 years old.de
dc.description.abstractWährend der COVID-19-Pandemie gingen viele Erhebungsprogramme zu selbstverwalteten Formen der Datenerhebung über und boten den Befragten häufig sowohl webbasierte als auch papierbasierte Fragebögen an. Es gibt jedoch kaum Anhaltspunkte dafür, wann welcher Modus angeboten werden sollte, insbesondere wenn das Ziel darin besteht, Teilnehmende für eine Panelerhebung zu rekrutieren. Diese Studie untersucht die Effektivität verschiedener Modus-Sequenz-Designs durch die Analyse eines Experiments, das in der Rekrutierungswelle der deutschen Panelstudie "Familienforschung und Demographische Analyse" durchgeführt wurde.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherMixed-mode; Mode-choice design; Panel survey; Recruitment experiment; Self-administered modesde
dc.titleConcurrent, Web-First, or Web-Only? How Different Mode Sequences Perform in Recruiting Participants for a Self-Administered Mixed-mode Panel Studyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozPanelde
dc.subject.thesozpanelen
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10054018
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal1883
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smae008de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record