Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorShang, Po P.de
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-27T15:16:36Z
dc.date.available2024-03-27T15:16:36Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn1868-4882de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/93449
dc.description.abstractSince 2011, while the principles of foreign policy "independent, active, and non-aligned" under the respective governments under the Union Solidarity and Development Party and the National League for Democracy have remained the same, the foreign policy approaches - including the concept of non-alignment - of the two leaders of these governments have been quite different. This article describes the survival and foreign policy of the small country of Myanmar beyond the great power lens, arguing that the impact of strategic culture on the two governments since 2011 has differed because of the different levels of legitimacy enjoyed by the two leaders. The cornerstones of Myanmar's strategic culture are (1) that it shall never tolerate foreign interference, (2) that it shall always pursue self-reliance in its diplomacy, and (3) that the very nature of Myanmar is to be independent.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.otherAußenpolitische Doktrin; National League for Democracyde
dc.titleMyanmar's foreign policy: shifting legitimacy, shifting strategic culturede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/18681034211044481de
dc.source.journalJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
dc.source.volume41de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.thesozMyanmarde
dc.subject.thesozMyanmaren
dc.subject.thesozAußenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozforeign policyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Strategiede
dc.subject.thesozpolitical strategyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Führungde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical leadershipen
dc.subject.thesozLegitimitätde
dc.subject.thesozlegitimacyen
dc.subject.thesozBlockfreiheitde
dc.subject.thesoznon-alignmenten
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Unabhängigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical independenceen
dc.subject.thesozSüdostasiende
dc.subject.thesozSoutheast Asiaen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10039601
internal.identifier.thesoz10034694
internal.identifier.thesoz10054894
internal.identifier.thesoz10044464
internal.identifier.thesoz10050767
internal.identifier.thesoz10039645
internal.identifier.thesoz10034369
internal.identifier.thesoz10036844
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo88-105de
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal193
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211044481de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://unapi.k10plus.de@@1788464540
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record