Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorRammstedt, Beatricede
dc.contributor.authorRoemer, Lenade
dc.contributor.authorLechner, Clemensde
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-27T11:58:16Z
dc.date.available2024-03-27T11:58:16Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn0191-8869de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/93439
dc.description.abstractAcquiescence ("yea-saying") presents a major challenge in personality assessment via questionnaire. Cognitive load when responding to items seems to be related to a greater tendency to acquiesce. The aim of this study was to experimentally investigate whether reducing the complexity of personality items through simplified item wording and response scales with fewer options reduces acquiesce. Based on a heterogeneous sample of almost 6000 respondents, we probed acquiescent responding on the 60-item Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) in a 2 × 2 design, comparing (a) the original items and simplified versions and (b) the original 5-point and a 4-point response scale without a midpoint. Results show that the response scale format did not affect acquiescent responding. Contrariwise, item simplification reduced the variance attributable to acquiescence in the total sample. Moderation analysis revealed stronger effects for lower-educated respondents.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherAcquiescence; Response styles; Big Five; BFI-2; Simplification; Educationde
dc.titleDo simpler item wording and response scales reduce acquiescence in personality inventories? A survey experimentde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalPersonality and Individual Differences
dc.publisher.countryNLDde
dc.source.issue214de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozPersönlichkeitde
dc.subject.thesozpersonalityen
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozFragebogende
dc.subject.thesozquestionnaireen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10047174
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10037914
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal1367
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112324de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record