Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Gorm Ryede
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-29T07:27:07Z
dc.date.available2024-02-29T07:27:07Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/92570
dc.description.abstractThe Western reactions to the Russian assault on Ukraine in 2022 were surprisingly united and tangible. This article argues that the intervention in the Russia-Ukraine war was a continuation of other liberal interventions that took place earlier in the current century. This article claims that there is no crisis of liberal interventionism because foreign policy decision-makers in the US agree that (liberal) interventions in foreign countries can serve the national interests of the US as well as the interests of the people in the countries affected. There is no crisis because the transatlantic partners in Europe backed the US in the interventions. Finally, there is no crisis of liberal interventionism because the domestic opposition in the US and Europe is too weak to restrain the liberal interventionist mood among Western governments. Liberal interventionism is still on the agenda.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.otherdemocratic peace theory; foreign policy elite; liberal interventionism; national strategic culturede
dc.titleThe Rumours of the Crisis of Liberal Interventionism Are Greatly Exaggeratedde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7352/3585de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume12de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.thesozAußenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozforeign policyen
dc.subject.thesozöffentliche Meinungde
dc.subject.thesozpublic opinionen
dc.subject.thesozSolidaritätde
dc.subject.thesozsolidarityen
dc.subject.thesozInterventionismusde
dc.subject.thesozinterventionismen
dc.subject.thesozUSAde
dc.subject.thesozUnited States of Americaen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Interventionde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical interventionen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10034694
internal.identifier.thesoz10052047
internal.identifier.thesoz10058003
internal.identifier.thesoz10041133
internal.identifier.thesoz10041244
internal.identifier.thesoz10047963
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.source.issuetopicFrom Kabul to Kyiv: The Crisis of Liberal Interventionism and the Return of Warde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7352de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7352
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record