Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorJia, Wenjuande
dc.contributor.authorYou, Siyude
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-28T12:56:21Z
dc.date.available2024-02-28T12:56:21Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2803de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/92542
dc.description.abstractChina has launched a comprehensive low‐carbon transition strategy at the same time as the concept of just transition is receiving extensive international attention from the academic community. A just transition needs to embrace the interests of workers in the new energy industry as well as those of miners and others facing job losses in traditional industries. Accordingly, this article focuses on how programmers at a new energy vehicle company in Shanghai negotiate wages with their employers. Employers trying to curtail the salaries of programmers find fault with their biographies, qualifications, and experiences to undermine their confidence and create an incentive‐driven competitive work environment. Programmers, in turn, try to improve their bargaining power by demonstrating their professional competence, job hopping, and informally investigating conditions at employing enterprises to take advantage of the competitive relationship between them. The interests of programmers in China's new energy vehicle industry are found to differ from those of Chinese state‐owned enterprise workers and migrant workers. Although individual negotiations can improve the wage levels of specific programmers in the short run, they are not conducive to the emergence of labor solidarity. Moreover, they exacerbate income inequality among workers and fail to bring justice to workers in the new energy industry.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherjob hopping; just transition; new energy vehicle industry; wage negotiationsde
dc.titlePower Games and Wage Negotiations in China's New Energy Vehicle Industryde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7454/3614de
dc.source.journalSocial Inclusion
dc.source.volume12de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozIndustrie- und Betriebssoziologie, Arbeitssoziologie, industrielle Beziehungende
dc.subject.classozSociology of Work, Industrial Sociology, Industrial Relationsen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozKollektivverhandlungde
dc.subject.thesozcollective bargainingen
dc.subject.thesozLohnde
dc.subject.thesozwageen
dc.subject.thesozArbeitsbeziehungende
dc.subject.thesozlabor relationsen
dc.subject.thesozEnergiewirtschaftde
dc.subject.thesozenergy industryen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10037663
internal.identifier.thesoz10035631
internal.identifier.thesoz10036176
internal.identifier.thesoz10041850
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10204
internal.identifier.journal786
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.source.issuetopicChina and Climate Change: Towards a Socially Inclusive and Just Transitionde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.7454de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7454
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record