Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPoveda, Cesar A.de
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-01T16:45:03Z
dc.date.available2024-02-01T16:45:03Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2297-6477de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/91800
dc.description.abstractCapturing the various facets of sustainable development is the main objective of sustainability assess- ment studies. Scientists and practitioners use sustainable development criteria and indicators as instruments to link the theoretical definitions with the evaluation of the effectiveness of management strategies; therefore, identifying and selecting indicators are the most critical processes in evaluating the implementation of sustainable development strategies and progress toward achieving sustainability goals and objectives. The manuscript argues the need for increasing credibility in the identification and selection of criteria and indicators through stakeholder engagement, participation and management. Sustainability aims to primarily address and balance the [social, economic, environmental] needs and expectations of stakeholders; therefore, reaching consensus amongst the various groups of stakeholders became the determining factor in the design, implementation, and assessment of sustainable development strategies. Because a precise definition of sustainability that is universally agreed upon is yet to be introduced, the process of identifying and selecting indicators to assess progress toward achieving sustainable development is embedded in subjectivity and vagueness and can be easily manipulated to meet particular interests. Furthermore, the absence of rigorous and standardized methodological frameworks contributes to continuously proposing set indicators that best capture the notion of sustainable development which creates distrust in the assessment process and directly affects the credibility of the sustainability concept. Departing from acknowledging the relevance of stakeholders groups in decision-making and management processes, the manuscript identifies and discusses three credible and reliable frameworks designed by consensus (FDC) to identify and select criteria and indicators to assess the sustainability performance of cities and communities: (1) ISO 37130:2018 which is complemented by ISO 37122:2019, (2) United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) with focus on Goal 11, and (3) customized frameworks for sustainable cities (CFSS). To minimize subjectivity and strengthen credibility, the manuscript also makes the case for the need of embedding FDC into sustainability assessment processes to identify and select criteria and indicators. Because of the methodology adopted for their development, FDC provide scientists and practitioners with reliable and credible sources to identify and select criteria and indicators for the assessment of the sustainability performance of cities and communities.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcÖkologiede
dc.subject.ddcEcologyen
dc.subject.otherliveability; sustainability assessment; sustainability criteria; sustainability indicators; sustainability performance; sustainable cities; Sustainable Development Goals; SDGsde
dc.titleThe Criticality of Using Frameworks Designed by Consensus (FDC) to Identify and Select Criteria and Indicators to Assess Sustainability Performance of Cities and Communitiesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/cis-11.1.19de
dc.source.journalChallenges in Sustainability
dc.source.volume11de
dc.publisher.countryCHEde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozÖkologie und Umweltde
dc.subject.classozEcology, Environmenten
dc.subject.thesozEntscheidungsfindungde
dc.subject.thesozdecision makingen
dc.subject.thesozLebensqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozquality of lifeen
dc.subject.thesozNachhaltigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozsustainabilityen
dc.subject.thesozStadtde
dc.subject.thesoztownen
dc.subject.thesoznachhaltige Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozsustainable developmenten
dc.subject.thesozKriteriumde
dc.subject.thesozcriterionen
dc.subject.thesozEvaluationde
dc.subject.thesozevaluationen
dc.subject.thesozIndikatorenbildungde
dc.subject.thesozconstruction of indicatorsen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10042187
internal.identifier.thesoz10050696
internal.identifier.thesoz10064837
internal.identifier.thesoz10035389
internal.identifier.thesoz10062390
internal.identifier.thesoz10039061
internal.identifier.thesoz10039188
internal.identifier.thesoz10047135
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo19-33de
internal.identifier.classoz20900
internal.identifier.journal795
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc577
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12924/cis2023.11010019de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttp://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/oai/@@oai:ojs.www.librelloph.com:article/758
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record