Diese Seite wird derzeit technisch überarbeitet. Es kann dabei vorübergehend zu längeren Ladezeiten kommen. Wir bitten, eventuelle Unannehmlichkeiten zu entschuldigen und danken für Ihr Verständnis.
Who Talks and Who Listens? How Political Involvement Influences the Potential for Democratic Deliberation in Everyday Political Talk
[journal article]
dc.contributor.author | Gärtner, Lea | de |
dc.contributor.author | Wuttke, Alexander | de |
dc.contributor.author | Schoen, Harald | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-28T12:39:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-28T12:39:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2634-0488 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/89414 | |
dc.description.abstract | In times of rising partisan polarization and increasing disenchantment with political elites, everyday political talk could constitute an important venue for citizen deliberation. Everyday political discussions offer ordinary people opportunities to strengthen deliberative skills, form considered preferences ,and hone political identities in relation to others. However, informal political discussions seldom follow the norms of formal deliberative fora, calling into question how often such everyday talk really enables democratic deliberation in the broader public. The answer is essential to assess the deliberative potential of everyday political talk and thus to understand its role in the deliberative system. Focusing on the democratic and deliberative standards of reason-giving, mutual respect, equality, and inclusion, we develop a multi-step model of democratic deliberation in everyday political talk, in which the potential for democratic deliberation depends on the presence of all four core standards. As individuals’ propensity for democratic deliberation is likely to vary with their level of political involvement, both in terms of how much they care about politics and how strongly they identify with political groups, we consider both dimensions when modeling democratic deliberation in individuals’ everyday political discussions. We test all steps of the model with data from a large panel survey tracing the informal political discussion networks of 18,079 German voters during the year leading up to the national elections in 2017. Our findings indicate that everyday political talk is more deliberative than expected, as the three core standards of democratic deliberation we can measure are largely upheld in people’s political exchanges. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.other | panel data; democratic deliberation; political discussion networks; political involvement; everyday political talk; ZA6804: Wahlkampf-Panel (GLES 2017) / Short-term Campaign Panel (GLES 2017) (Data file Version 6.0.0) | de |
dc.title | Who Talks and Who Listens? How Political Involvement Influences the Potential for Democratic Deliberation in Everyday Political Talk | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Journal of Deliberative Democracy | |
dc.source.volume | 17 | de |
dc.publisher.country | GBR | de |
dc.source.issue | 2 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Panel | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | panel | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Daten | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Deliberation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | deliberation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | politische Kommunikation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political communication | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political culture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | politische Partizipation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political participation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Diskurs | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | discourse | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Diskussion | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | discussion | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Bundesrepublik Deutschland | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Federal Republic of Germany | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-89414-0 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | FDB | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054018 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034708 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054815 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10049299 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10050182 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054194 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041158 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036741 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037571 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 13-30 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 2809 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.16997/10.16997/jdd.983 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 10500 | de |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture