dc.contributor.author | Mothes, Cornelia | de |
dc.contributor.author | Ohme, Jakob | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-25T09:37:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-25T09:37:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2183-2439 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/87944 | |
dc.description.abstract | This thematic issue includes ten articles that address previous contradictions in research on two main trends in digital democracies: news avoidance and political polarization. Looking at these contradictions from different angles, all contributions suggest one aspect in particular that could be important for future research to investigate more specifically possible countermeasures to harmful trends: the individualized, self‐reflective way in which media users nowadays engage with political content. The increasingly value‐based individualization of media use may be a hopeful starting point for reversing harmful trends to some degree by addressing individual media users as a community with a common base of civic values, rather than addressing them in their limited social group identities. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Publizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen | de |
dc.subject.ddc | News media, journalism, publishing | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.other | civic norms; corrective action; media trust; news avoidance; political polarization; politicized self; selective exposure; social identity | de |
dc.title | Enlightening Confusion: How Contradictory Findings Help Mitigate Problematic Trends in Digital Democracies | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet | de |
dc.description.review | reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6155 | de |
dc.source.journal | Media and Communication | |
dc.source.volume | 10 | de |
dc.publisher.country | PRT | de |
dc.source.issue | 3 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | interaktive, elektronische Medien | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Interactive, electronic Media | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Wirkungsforschung, Rezipientenforschung | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Impact Research, Recipient Research | en |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Desinformation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | disinformation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Polarisierung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | polarization | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Populismus | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | populism | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Massenmedien | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | mass media | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Vertrauen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | confidence | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Selektion | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | selection | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Nachrichten | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | news | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Individualisierung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | individualization | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | politischer Einfluss | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political influence | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10063936 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10063279 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10055018 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037618 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10061508 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037471 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10052870 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10047155 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041597 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 89-92 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 1080404 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 1080407 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 793 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 070 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | Enlightening Confusion: How Contradictory Findings Help Mitigate Problematic Trends in Digital Democracies | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.6155 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 2 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6155 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |