dc.contributor.author | Glas, Saskia | de |
dc.contributor.author | Spiering, Niels | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-21T07:46:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-21T07:46:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2673-3145 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/87808 | |
dc.description.abstract | Right-wing populist voices argue that Muslims do not belong in Western Europe because Islam opposes the "core Western value" of women's empowerment. Ironically, such hostilities could cause European Muslims to reject antagonistic natives and their "Western values," potentially creating backlashes in Muslims' support for gender equality. Delving into this possibility, this study diverges from simple conceptualizations of one inherently patriarchal Islam to study the diversity among Muslims in the gendered meanings they attach to their religion in different contexts. Empirically, we use a uniquely pooled dataset covering over 9,000 European Muslims in 16 Western European countries between 2008 and 2019. Multilevel models show that while mosque attendance limits support for public-sphere gender equality, religious identifications only do so among men and individual prayer only among women. Additionally, our results tentatively indicate that in more hostile contexts, prayer's effects become more patriarchal while religious identification's connection to opposition to gender equality weakens. We conclude that Islamic religiosities shape Muslims' support for public-sphere gender equality in far more complex ways than any right-wing populist claim on one essential patriarchal Islam captures. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Soziologie, Anthropologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sociology & anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | support for gender equality; hostility; context-dependency; EVS 2017 | de |
dc.title | The impact of anti-Muslim hostilities on how Muslims connect their religiosity to support for gender equality in Western Europe | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Frontiers in Political Science | |
dc.source.volume | 4 | de |
dc.publisher.country | CHE | de |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Women's Studies, Feminist Studies, Gender Studies | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Religionssoziologie | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Sociology of Religion | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | EVS | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | EVS | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Europa | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Europe | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Muslim | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Muslim | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Islam | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Islam | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Religiosität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | religiousness | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | öffentliche Meinung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | public opinion | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Gleichstellung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | affirmative action | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Ausländerfeindlichkeit | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | xenophobia | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Exklusion | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | exclusion | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Geschlechtsrolle | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | gender role | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-87808-5 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | FDB | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10079761 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042879 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10048095 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10048094 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10046464 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10052047 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045798 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037236 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10063808 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10044127 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 1-19 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 20200 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10218 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 1910 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 301 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.909578 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |