Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSilber, Henningde
dc.contributor.authorRoßmann, Jossde
dc.contributor.authorGummer, Tobiasde
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-08T09:53:36Z
dc.date.available2023-02-08T09:53:36Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn1552-3969de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/85091
dc.description.abstractAttention checks detect inattentiveness by instructing respondents to perform a specific task. However, while respondents may correctly process the task, they may choose to not comply with the instructions. We investigated the issue of noncompliance in attention checks in two web surveys. In Study 1, we measured respondents’ attitudes toward attention checks and their self-reported compliance. In Study 2, we experimentally varied the reasons given to respondents for conducting the attention check. Our results showed that while most respondents understand why attention checks are conducted, a nonnegligible proportion of respondents evaluated them as controlling or annoying. Most respondents passed the attention check; however, among those who failed the test, 61% seem to have failed the task deliberately. These findings reinforce that noncompliance is a serious concern with attention check instruments. The results of our experiment showed that more respondents passed the attention check if a comprehensible reason was given.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.titleThe Issue of Noncompliance in Attention Check Questions: False Positives in Instructed Response Itemsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urllocalfile:/var/tmp/crawlerFiles/deepGreen/566bfe1bb68343c482738ffbff2d92d8/566bfe1bb68343c482738ffbff2d92d8.pdfde
dc.source.journalField Methods
dc.source.volume34de
dc.publisher.countryUSAde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozAufmerksamkeitde
dc.subject.thesozattentionen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-85091-4
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10036983
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo346-360de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal1363
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X221115830de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence32
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.dda.referencecrawler-deepgreen-188@@566bfe1bb68343c482738ffbff2d92d8


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record