SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(external source)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v22i3.3017

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

"Por quê olhar os animais?" Ética da alteridade e animalidade em John Berger

"Why look at animals?" Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger
[journal article]

Uchôa, Mateus

Abstract

This paper propose a reading and application of the homo sacer metaphysical concept, central to the Giorgio Agamben In his text Why Look at Animals? John Berger comments on how the animal metaphor was an indispensable resource for revealing a closeness between species, and that without the example o... view more

This paper propose a reading and application of the homo sacer metaphysical concept, central to the Giorgio Agamben In his text Why Look at Animals? John Berger comments on how the animal metaphor was an indispensable resource for revealing a closeness between species, and that without the example of animals it would be unlikely, for example, to describe events such as those narrated by Homer in The Iliad. The correlation between similar and heterogeneous lives allowed human beings, inspired by animals, to provide answers to the first questions. It is reasonable to say that the first metaphor was that of the animal, as a way of sharing the world that was both common and different to them. But our relationship with non-human animals also contains contradictions; the creation of the zoo represented the raising of a monument to the impossibility of any reunion with animality. Instead of being liberated, animals were captured by other political categories. For John Berger the ambiguities remain "They are the objects of our ever-increasing knowledge. What we know about them is an index of our power, and so is an index of what separates us from them. The more we know, the more distant they become."... view less

Classification
Philosophy, Ethics, Religion

Free Keywords
Animal ethics; Metaphor; Otherness; Confinement

Document language
Portuguese

Publication Year
2022

Page/Pages
p. 183-194

Journal
Griot: Revista de Filosofia, 22 (2022) 3

ISSN
2178-1036

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.