Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorTorfs, Lorede
dc.contributor.authorAdriaenssens, Stefde
dc.contributor.authorLagaert, Susande
dc.contributor.authorWillems, Sarade
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-21T12:44:39Z
dc.date.available2022-06-21T12:44:39Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn1475-9276de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/79637
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Great Recession, starting in 2008, was characterized by an overall reduction in living standards. This pushed several governments across Europe to restrict expenditures, also in the area of healthcare. These austerity measures are known to have affected access to healthcare, probably unevenly among social groups. This study examines the unequal effects of retrenchment in healthcare expenditures on access to medical care for different income groups across European countries. Method: Using data of two waves (2008 and 2014) of the European Union Statistics of Income and Living Conditions survey (EU-SILC), a difference-in-differences (DD) approach was used to analyse the overall change in unmet medical needs over time within and between countries. By adding another interaction, the differences in the effects between income quintiles (difference-in-difference-in-differences: DDD) were estimated. To do so, comparisons between two pairs of a treatment and a control case were made: Iceland versus Sweden, and Ireland versus the United Kingdom. These comparisons are made between countries with recessions equal in magnitude, but with different levels of healthcare cuts. This strategy allows isolating the effect of cuts, net of the severity of the recession. Results: The DD-estimates show a higher increase of unmet medical needs during the Great Recession in the treatment cases (Iceland vs. Sweden: + 3.24 pp.; Ireland vs. the United Kingdom: + 1.15 pp). The DDD-estimates show different results over the two models. In Iceland, the lowest income groups had a higher increase in unmet medical needs. This was not the case in Ireland, where middle-class groups saw their access to healthcare deteriorate more. Conclusion: Restrictions on health expenditures during the Great Recession caused an increase in self-reported unmet medical needs. The burden of these effects is not equally distributed; in some cases, the lower-income groups suffer most. The case of Ireland, nevertheless, shows that certain policy measures may relatively spare lower-income groups while affecting middle-class income groups more. These results bring in evidence that policies can reduce and even overshoot the general effect of income inequalities on access to healthcare.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherunmet medical needs; inequity in health; EU-SILC 2008; EU-SILC 2014de
dc.titleThe unequal effects of austerity measures between income-groups on the access to healthcare: a quasi-experimental approachde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Journal for Equity in Health
dc.source.volume20de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.subject.classozGesundheitspolitikde
dc.subject.classozHealth Policyen
dc.subject.thesozRezessionde
dc.subject.thesozrecessionen
dc.subject.thesozEinsparungde
dc.subject.thesozsavingen
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitsversorgungde
dc.subject.thesozhealth careen
dc.subject.thesozBedarfde
dc.subject.thesozdemanden
dc.subject.thesozmedizinische Versorgungde
dc.subject.thesozmedical careen
dc.subject.thesozUngleichheitde
dc.subject.thesozinequalityen
dc.subject.thesozLebensstandardde
dc.subject.thesozstandard of livingen
dc.subject.thesozSparpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozausterity policyen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-79637-0
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10049572
internal.identifier.thesoz10042056
internal.identifier.thesoz10045504
internal.identifier.thesoz10034911
internal.identifier.thesoz10034647
internal.identifier.thesoz10041153
internal.identifier.thesoz10050669
internal.identifier.thesoz10037446
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-10de
internal.identifier.classoz11006
internal.identifier.journal1464
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01412-7de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record