Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorCoffé, Hildede
dc.contributor.authorReiser, Marionde
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T13:04:32Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T13:04:32Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn1460-373Xde
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/79154
dc.description.abstractBased on the German Longitudinal Election Study (2016), we explain citizens' support for measures to increase women’s descriptive representation in parliament. Despite women's underrepresentation, we find little support for positive action measures, and in particular for legal gender quotas. Binary logit analyses show that support for the introduction of positive action measures is not affected by citizens' perceptions about the share of female members of parliament. However, experimental data reveal that receiving information about women's actual proportion in parliament has an impact on citizens' support for gender quotas, in particular among those who overestimate women's representation. Once they learn that the actual share is lower than they thought, they are more likely to support the introduction of quotas. This indicates that support for positive action measures can be changed through providing the correct information.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherdescriptive representation; information-providing experimental design, positive action measures; Langfrist-Online-Tracking T34 (GLES) (ZA5734 v1.0.0)de
dc.titleHow perceptions and information about women’s descriptive representation affect support for positive action measuresde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Political Science Review
dc.publisher.countryUSAde
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozFrauen- und Geschlechterforschungde
dc.subject.classozWomen's Studies, Feminist Studies, Gender Studiesen
dc.subject.thesozQuotede
dc.subject.thesozquotaen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozöffentliche Meinungde
dc.subject.thesozpublic opinionen
dc.subject.thesozParlamentde
dc.subject.thesozparliamenten
dc.subject.thesozFrauenanteilde
dc.subject.thesozproportion of womenen
dc.subject.thesozFraude
dc.subject.thesozwomanen
dc.subject.thesozWahrnehmungde
dc.subject.thesozperceptionen
dc.subject.thesozInformationspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozinformation policyen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-79154-1
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10036360
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10052047
internal.identifier.thesoz10040125
internal.identifier.thesoz10094082
internal.identifier.thesoz10038633
internal.identifier.thesoz10040719
internal.identifier.thesoz10047391
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-18de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.classoz20200
internal.identifier.journal550
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0192512121995748de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record