Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBohunenko, Valeriyde
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-17T14:50:51Z
dc.date.available2021-12-17T14:50:51Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2504-5571de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/76369
dc.description.abstractTransformations of the administrative-territorial status of monoprofile cities of Donbas in the context of development of structural-settlement structure of the region in the late 1940s and 1980s are considered. The urgency of the study is due to the reform of decentralization in Ukraine - changes in the order of local self-government and territorial organization of power. Its goal is to create communities that are self‑sufficient and effective in the economic, administrative and socio‑cultural dimensions. In the course of reform, monoprofile cities often acquire the status of centers of united territorial communities. In assessing the relevance of such decisions to the purpose of the reform, it is advisable to examine the relationship of structural-settlement, socio-economic and administrative-territorial status of these cities in historical retrospect. It turns out that the monoprofile cities of the region are an industrial-urban phenomenon, the genesis of which influenced the formation of the specifics of the settlement structure of Donbas. During the study period, the number of such cities more than doubled, reaching more than sixty cities in the late 1980s. Their share among the settlements of the region with the administrative status of a city was at that time two thirds. The emergence of monoprofile cities in the region in large numbers in the 1940s - 1980s is associated with government-industrial policy. At the same time, the structural and settlement importance of these settlements was reflected in their acquisition of the administrative-territorial status of region or district cities. From the beginning of the study period, the vast majority of cities with a narrow industrial base in the region belonged to the cities of district subordination, as they did not meet high enough urban criteria. In the urbanized region, in the presence of other, more powerful urban centers, the corresponding role in the administrative-territorial organization programmed the secondary nature of their structural settlement development. In particular, it did not contribute to the formation of micro-regions around these cities, which must be taken into account in the current conditions of reforming local self-government and territorial organization in the country.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.ddcÖffentliche Verwaltung, Militärwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPublic administrationen
dc.subject.othermonoprofile cities; Donbas; administrative territorial status; settlement structurede
dc.titleAnalysis of changes in the administrative-territorial status of monoprofile cities of Donbas (late 1940s - 1980s)de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalEUREKA: Social and Humanities
dc.publisher.countryMISCde
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.classozVerwaltungswissenschaftde
dc.subject.classozAdministrative Scienceen
dc.subject.thesozUkrainede
dc.subject.thesozUkraineen
dc.subject.thesozregionale Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozregional developmenten
dc.subject.thesozSiedlungsstrukturde
dc.subject.thesozsettlement patternen
dc.subject.thesozRegionde
dc.subject.thesozregionen
dc.subject.thesozStrukturde
dc.subject.thesozstructureen
dc.subject.thesozhistorische Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozhistorical developmenten
dc.subject.thesozDezentralisationde
dc.subject.thesozdecentralizationen
dc.subject.thesozRaumordnungde
dc.subject.thesozzoningen
dc.subject.thesozVerwaltungde
dc.subject.thesozadministrationen
dc.subject.thesozkommunale Selbstverwaltungde
dc.subject.thesozlocal self-governmenten
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10064141
internal.identifier.thesoz10042235
internal.identifier.thesoz10057895
internal.identifier.thesoz10044625
internal.identifier.thesoz10034872
internal.identifier.thesoz10034801
internal.identifier.thesoz10040948
internal.identifier.thesoz10040084
internal.identifier.thesoz10034574
internal.identifier.thesoz10049262
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo58-64de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.classoz40200
internal.identifier.journal1727
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
internal.identifier.ddc350
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2021.001862de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record