Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKroll, Estherde
dc.contributor.authorVeit, Susannede
dc.contributor.authorZiegler, Matthiasde
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-15T08:34:19Z
dc.date.available2021-12-15T08:34:19Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/76300
dc.description.abstractPeople from marginalized groups are often discriminated against in traditional recruitment processes. Yet as companies faced with skill shortages change their recruitment strategies, the question arises as to whether modern recruitment trends such as the use of professional social network sites, active sourcing, and recruitment assignment to external agencies are affected by implicit or explicit discrimination. In our mixed-method study, we first conducted expert interviews with different types of recruiters to explore the potential for discrimination in the modern recruitment process. We then analyzed panel data from the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) in Germany to see whether there is quantitative evidence of discrimination in modern recruitment. A content analysis of the interviews shows that active sourcing and assignment of recruitment to private agencies are potentially affected by explicit discrimination. We identified three sources of discrimination in personnel selection: recruiters’ own attitudes, explicit instructions from managers, and the recruiters’ assumptions regarding companies’ preferred candidates. The results of mixed multilevel analyses with the company as a second level resonate with the qualitative findings: companies actively approach female employees, older employees, and employees who are born in Southern/Eastern Europe less often and offer women jobs less often. The effects for gender were still significant when we included far-right voting as a moderator variable on the employee level, but the interactions were not significant. Effects for gender and older people in active sourcing were also significant and robust when controlling for income, number of children, level of school completion, and educational background. Our findings suggest that current legislation may be insufficient to protect candidates who belong to marginalized groups from discrimination in modern recruitment.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.subject.otherMODE-model; active sourcing; far-right attitudes; marginalized groups; recruitment assignment; social network sites (SNSs)de
dc.titleThe Discriminatory Potential of Modern Recruitment Trends - A Mixed-Method Study From Germanyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Psychology
dc.source.volume12de
dc.publisher.countryCHEde
dc.subject.classozPersonalwesende
dc.subject.classozHuman Resources Managementen
dc.subject.classozSozialpsychologiede
dc.subject.classozSocial Psychologyen
dc.subject.thesozStellenbesetzungde
dc.subject.thesozstaffingen
dc.subject.thesozRekrutierungde
dc.subject.thesozrecruitmenten
dc.subject.thesozArbeitskräftebedarfde
dc.subject.thesozmanpower requirementsen
dc.subject.thesozFachkraftde
dc.subject.thesozspecialisten
dc.subject.thesozPersonalpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozpersonnel policyen
dc.subject.thesozDiskriminierungde
dc.subject.thesozdiscriminationen
dc.subject.thesozMarginalitätde
dc.subject.thesozmarginalityen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsocial factorsen
dc.subject.thesozdemographische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozdemographic factorsen
dc.subject.thesozStereotypde
dc.subject.thesozstereotypeen
dc.subject.thesozEinstellungde
dc.subject.thesozattitudeen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionWZBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10038789
internal.identifier.thesoz10035821
internal.identifier.thesoz10036291
internal.identifier.thesoz10043136
internal.identifier.thesoz10054341
internal.identifier.thesoz10038125
internal.identifier.thesoz10037383
internal.identifier.thesoz10045241
internal.identifier.thesoz10040663
internal.identifier.thesoz10041741
internal.identifier.thesoz10036125
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-21de
internal.identifier.classoz1090402
internal.identifier.classoz10706
internal.identifier.journal790
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc330
internal.identifier.ddc150
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.634376de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.econstor.eu/oai/request@@oai:econstor.eu:10419/246742
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record