Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorGarz, Marcelde
dc.contributor.authorSörensen, Jilde
dc.contributor.authorStone, Daniel F.de
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-29T07:05:13Z
dc.date.available2021-10-29T07:05:13Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn0167-2681de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/75467
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the effects of variation in "congeniality" of news on Facebook user engagement (likes, shares, and comments). We compile an original data set of Facebook posts by 84 German news outlets on politicians that were investigated for criminal offenses from January 2012 to June 2017. We also construct an index of each outlet's media slant by comparing the language of the outlet with that of the main political parties, which allows us to measure the congeniality of the posts. We find that user engagement with congenial posts is higher than with uncongenial ones, especially in terms of likes. The within-outlet, within-topic design allows us to infer that the greater engagement with congenial news is likely driven by psychological and social factors, rather than a desire for accurate or otherwise instrumental information.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otherPolitbarometer; filter bubble; media bias; political immunityde
dc.titlePartisan selective engagement: evidence from Facebookde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization
dc.source.volume177de
dc.publisher.countryNLDde
dc.subject.classozinteraktive, elektronische Mediende
dc.subject.classozInteractive, electronic Mediaen
dc.subject.classozWirkungsforschung, Rezipientenforschungde
dc.subject.classozImpact Research, Recipient Researchen
dc.subject.thesozFacebookde
dc.subject.thesozfacebooken
dc.subject.thesozSoziale Mediende
dc.subject.thesozsocial mediaen
dc.subject.thesozPolarisierungde
dc.subject.thesozpolarizationen
dc.subject.thesozImmunitätde
dc.subject.thesozimmunityen
dc.subject.thesozNachrichtende
dc.subject.thesoznewsen
dc.subject.thesozNachrichtenagenturde
dc.subject.thesoznews agencyen
dc.subject.thesozPolitikerde
dc.subject.thesozpoliticianen
dc.subject.thesozNutzungde
dc.subject.thesozutilizationen
dc.subject.thesozMedienverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozmedia behavioren
dc.subject.thesozEngagementde
dc.subject.thesozinvolvementen
dc.subject.thesozsozialpsychologische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsociopsychological factorsen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-75467-7
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10085689
internal.identifier.thesoz10094228
internal.identifier.thesoz10063279
internal.identifier.thesoz10034350
internal.identifier.thesoz10052870
internal.identifier.thesoz10034698
internal.identifier.thesoz10049279
internal.identifier.thesoz10037812
internal.identifier.thesoz10051166
internal.identifier.thesoz10034997
internal.identifier.thesoz10049142
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo91-108de
internal.identifier.classoz1080404
internal.identifier.classoz1080407
internal.identifier.journal196
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.06.016de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record