SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(1.161Mb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.75127

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Can Platforms Cancel Politicians? How States and Platforms Deal with Private Power over Public and Political Actors: an Exploratory Study of 15 Countries

[collection]

Fertmann, Martin
Kettemann, Matthias C.
(ed.)

Corporate Editor
Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)

Abstract

In January 2021, a great "deplatforming" took place: Numerous internet platforms suspended the accounts of Donald Trump and his supporters. Private power over public speech is often contested, but the conflicts are magnified when this power is asserted over parties, political candidates and office h... view more

In January 2021, a great "deplatforming" took place: Numerous internet platforms suspended the accounts of Donald Trump and his supporters. Private power over public speech is often contested, but the conflicts are magnified when this power is asserted over parties, political candidates and office holders that function as focal points for public debates. While most platforms' terms of use and enforcement systems are global, opinions relating to any preferential treatment of speech by well-known political figures and office holders vary across national political and legal contexts. This study examines the interplay between these national conceptions and global private ordering systems by synthesizing answers to nine questions submitted by more than 30 researchers from 15 countries within the GDHR Network. It provides a first overview of how societies and governments conceive of and react to private power over political actors.... view less

Keywords
EU; freedom of opinion; opinion formation; public opinion; content; legal factors; moderator; regulation; Europe; social media; governance; human rights; information policy; online media; disinformation

Classification
Media Politics, Information Politics, Media Law
Law
Interactive, electronic Media

Free Keywords
Platform Governance; Public Actors; Political Candidates; Newsworthiness Exemption; National Contexts

Document language
English

Publication Year
2021

Publisher
Verlag Hans-Bredow-Institut

City
Hamburg

Page/Pages
86 p.

Series
GDHRNet Working Paper, 3

Status
Primary Publication; reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.