Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSilber, Henningde
dc.contributor.authorZüll, Corneliade
dc.contributor.authorKühnel, Steffen M.de
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-27T13:55:15Z
dc.date.available2021-09-27T13:55:15Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn1614-2241de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/74969
dc.description.abstractOpen survey questions are often used to evaluate closed questions. However, they can fulfil this function only if there is a strong link between answers to open questions and answers to related closed questions. Using reasons for non-voting reported in the German Longitudinal Election Study 2013, we investigated this link by examining whether the reported reasons for non-voting may be substantive reasons or ex-post legitimations. We tested five theoretically derived hypotheses about respondents who gave, or did not give, a specific reason. Results showed that (a) answers to open questions were indeed related to answers to closed questions and could be used in explanatory turnout models to predict voting behavior, and (b) the relationship between answers to open and closed questions and the predictive power of reasons given in response to the open questions were stronger in the post-election survey (reported behavior) than in the pre-election survey (intended behavior).de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otheropen questions; election; non-voting; random imputation; ZA5702: Pre- and Post-election Cross Section (Cumulation) (GLES 2013)de
dc.titleWhat Can We Learn From Open Questions in Surveys? A Case Study on Non-Voting Reported in the 2013 German Longitudinal Election Studyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalMethodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
dc.source.volume16de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozWahlforschungde
dc.subject.thesozelection researchen
dc.subject.thesozWahlverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozvoting behavioren
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-74969-1
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10054727
internal.identifier.thesoz10061173
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo41-58de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal1675
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5964/meth.2801de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.description.miscFDBde
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record